personally i think the govt was involved and at least knew about and at most planned it ...
2007-09-22 10:01:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
1) Although it has been stated that there are scientists who are skeptical of the official explanation of 9/11, these so-called scientists have published nothing at all. Not one article on their 9/11 beliefs.
On the contrary, the real experts have printed dozens of real articles, in peer-reviewed journals, technical journals, and trade journals explaining how the jets caused the Towers to collapse.
Real science lives in peer-reviewed journal articles where everyone can see it and validate it. It is not somebody just saying something.
The reason is you don’t see their ideas published is because the conspiracy theory has been rejected by the real scientific community utterly & completely.
2) It’s easy to think that explosions have occurred during a heart-stopping collapse of a gigantic building. However, Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that were running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
...
2007-09-22 17:09:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by J 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
The collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7 are the most widely studied examples of engineering failure in history. People all over the world have been studying what happened.
Nobody has found a single trace of any planted explosives.
2007-09-22 17:07:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Hi Charlette, this question should've probably been listed in the politics & government section, but just like me, I'm sure that other people will answer it anyway.
I've always thought from day one, that 9/11 was a conspiracy. They found the "perpetrators" identity and photos far too quickly. But the biggest thing for me was the fact that all of those commercial airplanes, flew outside of their established flight plans and no one did a thing. Flight plans have to be filed and they are to be adhered to, unless a situation arises where the planes MUST change course.
If you've never seen the movie the Long Kiss Goodnight, with Geena Davis and Samuel Jackson, rent it and watch it. It's both entertaining and thought provoking. This movie was made long before 9/11, yet it deals with American government agencies, plotting terrorist attacks in U.S. cities, and framing muslims, in order to scare funds out of Congress. 9/11 is probably the biggest conspiracy of our lifetime. It's funny how many Americans opened their mouths wide for the spoon, and then swallowed the whole load of BS that was spoon fed to them.
2007-09-22 17:10:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by grace95838 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
I think people need to stop moaning about 9/11 and move on. Your gvt had nothing to do with it. Some religious nutjobs on the other side of the world did.
Stop with the crazy conspiracy theories and move on.
2007-09-22 17:23:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, it was NOT a government conspiracy,
Bldg 7 collapsed because it's steel softened due to the exposure to fire.
Learn the facts here:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
2007-09-22 17:18:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anthony M 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The buildings collapsed due to a chain of events that was initiated when two 747s going at full speed slammed into them.
2007-09-22 17:01:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
No. That is just patently absurd.
And what experts? Popular Science did an audit of the investigation for a cover story, and they didn't find a one with any real credentials.
2007-09-22 17:02:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Yes it was a conspiracy. A conspiracy is an agreement by two or more people to engage in criminal activity. There were 19 hijackers. They conspired.
2007-09-22 17:02:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
I'm not sure but I think it's likely. The twin towers came down like buildings that are demolished with explosives.
2007-09-22 17:02:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm still 50/50 on it. There was much concrete dust surrounding the building, indicating implosion; however, the explosion of jet fuel from the airplanes could also cause dust (albeit, not as much, nor as fine, as what results from implosion). So, the truth is, I'm not sure, and nobody may ever know.
2007-09-22 17:01:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋