2007-09-20 05:22:55 · 6 answers · asked by Mark M 1 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Respiratory Diseases
You didn't have anything to precede this statement, but I do think that prevention is always better than having to cure after the fact (I'm sure there may be some anomalies, but for the great majority). It also usually requires less effort to prevent than it does to cure.
2007-09-20 05:27:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, always.. but rarely is prevention 100%.. so it's still important to work on the cure as well.
2007-09-20 05:38:50 · answer #2 · answered by pip 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm preventing wasting my time by ignoring this question.
Damn.
2007-09-20 05:45:21 · answer #3 · answered by Yosemite Sam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh!!!!
If you need to be cured you have the affliction!
2007-09-20 05:28:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!!!!
2007-09-20 05:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by donkey_biscuits 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Always.
2007-09-20 05:29:21 · answer #6 · answered by Teresa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋