Did you know why the books on Evolution invented the word "PREhistoric"?See,since there is NO proof for evolution,not even historical proof,they invented prehistoric because they ASSUME it happened BEFORE historical proof.
2007-09-20 04:17:47 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Also,since evolutionists have no proof,besides the mantra "there is lots of proof" statement,they resort to degrading the creationist instead.
http://www.cseblogs.com
2007-09-20 04:32:41 · update #1
Prehistoric was invented in the1800's.If you look at a dictionary in the 1700's,it is NOT in there
2007-09-22 04:46:00 · update #2
So you think that the word "prehistoric" didn't exist before Darwin?
Does God tie your shoes for you?
Did He tell you to go to Yahoo!Answers and write inane things about topics you know nothing about?
I'm with Joe on this - it's unlikely that anything more stupid than this question will appear on this site today, unless you're still posting.
2007-09-20 04:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 1⤋
actually the word prehistoric has been used by science for a long time, not just by evolutionists, of which i am one.
my biggest wonder, is why so many religious people are afraid of evolution.
if you cut yourself, you body will heal, the cut will go away, and your skin will heal so well that you might not even get a scar.
evolution is very similar, but on a global system.
as things, or species get better at dealing with the changing world, the improved models become stronger, and more dominant.
if you really look at evolution, with an open mind, it is an extremely complicated, and very detailed way for life to sustain itself.
if the complication of the system isn't proof that there is a god, i don't know what is.
god is all knowing, all seeing, he is the source of all intelligence.
if you can't give him credit for the way life has developed on this world, then you are really selling him short.
take a look, it might even make you admire his intelligence that much more!
there is no more 'intelligent design' then evolution!
2007-09-20 17:34:43 · answer #2 · answered by buddhablue 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You yourself is a proof of evolution. The fact that your mind can undergo evolution should be enough as proof. Otherwise read some books about the realtime study of evolution of bacteria.
Get a proper education too, while you're at it.
2007-09-20 11:31:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
whatever dude, keep telling yourself that. try reading a book besides the bible for a change. yeah, god just put all those fossils in the ground to f**k with us right? yeah there are no transitional fossils right? except for maybe -
Fish to Amphibians
Tiktaalik roseae
Osteolepis
Eusthenopteron
Panderichthys
Elginerpeton
Obruchevichthys
Hynerpeton
Tulerpeton
Acanthostega
Ichthyostega
Pederpes finneyae
Eryops
Amphibians to Amniotes (early reptiles)
Proterogyrinus
Limnoscelis
Tseajaia
Solenodonsaurus
Hylonomus
Paleothyris
Synapsid (mammal-like "reptiles") to mammals
Protoclepsydrops
Clepsydrops
Dimetrodon
Procynosuchus
Thrinaxodon
Yanoconodon
Diapsid reptiles to birds
Yixianosaurus
Pedopenna
Archaeopteryx
Changchengornis
Confuciusornis
Ichthyornis
Evolution of whales
Pakicetus
Ambulocetus
Kutchicetus
Artiocetus
Dorudon
Basilosaurus
Eurhinodelphis
Mammalodon
Evolution of the horse
Hyracotherium
Mesohippus
Parahippus
Merychippus
Pliohippus
Equus
Non-human apes to modern humans
Pierolapithecus catalaunicus
Ardipithecus
Australopithecus
Homo rudolfensis
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
yeah that's nothing right?
you're the one that claims that there's some supernatural landlord that watches everything we do like we're a bunch of lab rats. your crowd is the one with the outdated medival superstitious male cow manure.
to quote a hero of mine,
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan.
all you have is an outdated book of myths. get a life you ignorant f**k.
peace.
2007-09-20 11:30:53 · answer #4 · answered by WreckinShop 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
History is human recorded records of events. Anything that happened before writing was prehistorical.
Human writing is not the only evidence that events occurred, not by a long shot. In fact, evidence such as fossil, molecular, and structural are far more detailed and reliable sources of information than written accounts.
2007-09-20 11:26:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
People sometimes question the validity of evidence for evolution, saying "How can you know this is true, if you weren't there to see it?" It is certainly true that humans were not around for most of the last 4 billion years or so, to witness first hand the origin of living organisms. However, many crimes also go unwitnessed, and we still feel confident enough about deducing what happened from the evidence available later, that a person's life or freedom can be spared or forfeited in a court of law on the strength of it. So, the lack of eyewitness testimony is not a valid objection to the argument for evolution.
If you would like to actually read some real science, you will see that there is abundant evidence for evolution.
2007-09-20 11:21:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 2⤋
Pre historic evidence is that part of the program that produces the most agitation among those embedded with the Fundamentalist script. That elegant piece of coding is used to produce the most energy that can be extracted from some of the crops.
Take your blue pill.
2007-09-20 11:26:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Stunned by the vast depth of understanding you have for evolution and science in general.
Don't give up your day job. There can never be too many burger flippers.
2007-09-20 12:10:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The term first appears in English in 1851, derived from the French. It precedes "Origin of Species". There is evidence that there was human activity prior to writing, just like there is evidence your assertion is wrong.
2007-09-20 11:27:53 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I can't tell if this is serious or a parody. I've talked to too many Creationists...
Really. I can't tell. I once held a conversation with a Creationist that was almost this insane.
2007-09-20 11:48:49 · answer #10 · answered by Scott M 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋