English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Infinite fuel for everyone (that has access to the sea)

2007-09-14 08:20:23 · 12 answers · asked by proteusmirabilus 4 in Environment Green Living

12 answers

It's not infinite fuel. In order to burn the hydrogen, you have to separate it from the oxygen. He uses a frequency generator to do this, but the generator requires energy to work. You're going to be putting more energy into the generator than you're going to get out by burning the hydrogen. The result is a net loss of energy.

2007-09-14 08:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 5 1

When will this go away. Listen up everyone!!! This is NOTHING more than another way to disassociate water into hydrogen and oxygen. There are other methods, such as electrolysis and steam reforming of hydrocarbons. All of these processes involve an energy input, in this case, radio frequency electromagnetic radiation. Once you have broken up the water molecule, you can burn the hydrogen to produce heat. But, the energy produced by burning the hydrogen will always be less than the energy input used to break up the water molecule. This is the second law of thermodynamics. It is immutable. There is no way around it. There is no free fuel.

2007-09-14 12:21:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Buy platinum futures now.

You have to use a catalyst (platinum wire) to split the water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. They have been doing this for years. The process takes more energy than is released in the combustion of the hydrogen. The excess heat generated electricity may off set the input side of the equation but it still doesn't make it efficient on the output side.

There is still so no propetual motion machine.

2007-09-14 09:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by RomeoMike 5 · 2 0

This is a scam. It has been around for over 40 years.

Many years ago this was a scheme to sell a worthless penny stock. Apparently they have brought the scheme back.


The promoters hire a publicity firm to put out press releases to news organizations who pick it up because they do not understand the science.

They use the publicity on the news programs to gain credibility. The promoters show the video clips from the news program to people like you and me and encourage us to invest our life savings into the stock of the company that has the device.

The video clips from the news program add credibility to the device.

The only problem is that the device does not really work as described. The device is worthless, and the stock is worthless.

The promoters disappear with the money. The people who bought the stock lose their money. in some cases their life savings.

Please do not contribute to the promotion of this scam.

2007-09-14 08:57:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Not true. He discovered it is possible to extract the hydrogen from the water molecules in sea water using RF energy. But we have long known how to do the same thing with DC electricity, so it is no big deal IMO.

2007-09-14 08:50:59 · answer #5 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 3 0

$25 a gallon, what do you think of? nicely i assume it wasn't the holy water that burned me, regardless of the undeniable fact that it grew to become into there and it did no longer warn me or tell me, "no", so I discern it had something to do with it. no one is punctiliously harmless. Garlic, why it truly is as sturdy as ten mothers, or so the action picture says.

2016-11-10 11:00:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yea one more "Alternative"energy source we will be waiting for them to develop 1000 years from now. Soon as they can get perpetual motion up and running.

2007-09-14 11:45:58 · answer #7 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 1 0

They're not getting energy from the water.

They're getting it from the electricity they're putting into the water.

They get back less out than they put in.

2007-09-14 08:39:41 · answer #8 · answered by Bob 7 · 6 0

The idea is still in it's infancy. The chemist who stumbled on it is meeting the Dept. of Energy and Dept. of Defense to try and get funding.

Check this out:

http://www.livescience.com/technology/070604_sound_electricity.html

2007-09-14 08:26:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Hmmm....Thanks for the question, further investigation is required.

2007-09-14 09:10:17 · answer #10 · answered by smittybo20 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers