Muslims quote Muslim propaganda, Have they ever researched a source? If they did wouldn't they know the gospel is the same and taught the crucifiction before Muhammad?
2007-09-08 19:33:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Thousands:
1) Newton was a firm believer in God he claimed that religion was changed in fourth century. He died as mental case because of these confusions.
2) Napolean declared that very soon I will start a government with laws of Quran.
3) Maximilien Robespierre who celebrated this creed in 1794 when after controlling the government of France in the 1790s after the French Revolution he wanted to restart a religion based on acknowledgment of the supreme being (One God) and the soul's immortality to replace Christianity (belief of Trinity).
4) Bernard Shaw
2007-09-08 18:57:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i might assume that when the Catholic Church starts off appearing in a manner well worth respecting, it is going to quit being picked on. If it have been to quit hiding pedophiles, quit its quasi-polytheism (saints and such), refrain from inventing stupid and baseless suggestions (limbo) or perhaps take the ambitious humane step and quit coaching anti-condom doctrine in the areas of Africa toughest hit by ability of AIDS, then i think it may well be seen as better than an previous ability and money sink for grasping and unhappy people.
2016-12-13 03:55:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They get their theology from watching "Jerry Springer".Now I know that sounds foolish but it is true on some accord.They are told to watch Springer and that is what we are like and why we need conquering.That's straight from a Muslim co-worker pal.
Actually they like to quote out of context words of Liberal Theologians.You know,the type that vote by colored beans if they accept the words of Jesus as written in scripture.What I'm saying in a silly way is absolutely true.
2007-09-08 18:48:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
One has to ask why Yahoo R&S is not available in countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.They do the utmost to keep the truth out of the public.
2007-09-08 22:50:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Historical Quotes Concerning Paul and his doctrines from Historians, Philosophers and Theologians:
" We do not know of any book in the whole world less authenticated as to date, authers' names or tradition than our own christian Bible "--[ Isis Unveiled by Blavatsky, vol. II, p-277 ]
Carl Sagan (Scientist; Author)
"My long-time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly immiscible parts--the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn't much left when he was done, but it
was an inspiring document." (Letter to Ken Schei [author of Christianity Betrayed])
Thomas Jefferson
"Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus." (All references not listed here, can be found in Christianity Betrayed)
Albert Schweitzer
"Where possible Paul avoids quoting the teaching of Jesus, in fact even mentioning it. If we had to rely on Paul, we should not know that Jesus taught in parables, had delivered the sermon on the mount, and had taught His disciples the 'Our Father.' Even where they are specially relevant, Paul passes over the words of the Lord."
Wil Durant (Philosopher)
"Paul created a theology of which none but the vaguest warrants can be found in the words of
Christ."
"Fundamentalism is the triumph of Paul over Christ."
Walter Kaufmann (Professor of Philosophy, Princeton)
"Paul substituted faith in Christ for the Christlike life."
George Bernard Shaw
"No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus."
Thomas Hardy
"The new testament was less a Christiad than a Pauliad."
Hyam Maccoby (Talmudic Scholar)
"As we have seen, the purposes of the book of Acts is to minimize the conflict between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem Church, James and Peter. Peter and Paul, in later Christian tradition, became twin saints, brothers in faith, and the idea that they were historically bitter opponents standing for irreconcilable religious standpoints would have been repudiated with horror. The work of the author of Acts was well done; he rescued Christianity from the imputation of being the individual creation of Paul, and instead gave it a respectable pedigree, as a doctrine with the authority of the so-called Jerusalem Church, conceived as continuous in
spirit with the Pauline Gentile Church of Rome. Yet, for all his efforts, the truth of the matter is not hard to recover, if we examine the New Testament evidence with an eye to tell-tale
inconsistencies and confusions, rather than with the determination to gloss over and harmonize all difficulties in the interests of an orthodox interpretation." (The Mythmaker, p. 139,Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1986)
Jeremy Bentham (English Philosopher)
"If Christianity needed an Anti-Christ, they needed look no farther than Paul." (Paraphrased. Looking for a copy of "Not Paul, but Jesus" in order to retrieve the exact quote.)
Carl Jung (Psychologist)
"Paul hardly ever allows the real Jesus of Nazareth to get a word in." (U.S. News and World
Report, April 22, 1991, p. 55)
Bishop John S. Spong (Episcopal Bishop of Newark)
"Paul's words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference." (Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991).
2007-09-08 18:49:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The bible is a history book that explained things the best way they could 3000 years ago,, how could you take this book seriously in modern times?every volcano,earthquake,astroid they seen or heard was god talking to them
come on half the book is ''visions'' or hallucinations,that the wrighters wrote down
2007-09-08 18:51:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably the same ones who keep throwing around all those incredibly high numbers of Muslim converts.
2007-09-08 18:46:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by babbie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
"Christianity...[has become] the most perverted system that ever shone on man....Rogueries, absurdities and untruths were perpetrated upon the teachings of Jesus by a large band of dupes and importers led by Paul, the first great corrupter of the teaching of Jesus." --- Thomas Jefferson
“There is strong reason to believe that St. Paul fabricated the belief system of Christianity from Zoroastrian mythology. In order to hide Paul’s plaigerism… Christians burned the library of Alexandria in 390 A.D. Books in that library kept Mithra’s original story of what Pauline Doctrine is an almost exact copy. (George Sarton , Introduction to History of Sciences) ,
The Christian Trinity is a copy of the Pagan religion of Rome called Mithraism. Mithra was a half man half god who died for the sins of his followers. Guess what date the SUN god Mithra was born on ? - Thats right ...December 25th
The concept of God having a son is the basis of most Polytheistic religions and the exact opposite of the Abrahamic message of Monotheism. Your Lord is ONE – no partner, no Son , No God incarnate.
“The son-ship of Jesus Christ is the greatest fiction of human history.” (Lord Bishop of Canterbury Commission, the Spiritual Head of England, 1910.)
“The son-ship of Jesus Christ, the Trinity, the blood sacrifice of the lamb of God, atonement are not the teachings of Jesus. These are all inventions of Saint Paul who never really met Jesus.” (Hastings Rashdall, The Theory of Good and Evil)
“In the Christian world, you do not talk about God, when talking of god. Every Christian talks about his or her own conception of God “ (Nicholas Berdyeau, Destiny of Man.)
"The New Testament is mysteriously silent about Jesus between twelve and thirty years. I wonder what the Son of God had been doing on God's earth during that time ! " (Max Marshall, The Great Fiction)
“I counted 30,000 contradictions in the New Testament. (Dr. Maile, Confessions of a Sceptic)
"Initially there were 34 gospels that were compiled by word of mouth. Four were chosen for unclear reasons and 30 were left behind [burned]. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
"Jesus and his disciples spoke Aramaic but the gospels were written in Greek ! A man in Jerusalem wrote Messiah's Biography on hearsay. That is what the gospel is. (Martin Springler, A Quest for Truth)
“Few scholars can disagree that the fourth gospel was written by some nameless mystic between 95 to 125 C.E. “ (Dr. W.R. Inge, The Fall of Idols)
"All the gospels - Matthew, Luke and John openly contradict each other. ( Earnest Renan, Essay on Nationality)
///
2007-09-08 18:48:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋