Just find some footage from Ruwanda when the mobs were hacking people to death.
Only the Iraqi's would be more high tech and organized... resulting in a much higher death count and more organized ethnic cleansing.
At least until the Iranian troops could get across the border to take control of the south and east... and probably some Syraian troops countered from the west. With the Kurds declaring and independant Kurdistan -- inspiring uprisings of Kurds in Turkey, Iran and Syria -- all of which would be put down in very a very bloody way followed by intervention by all three of those countries to quash the newly independant Kurdistan.
But no one on the left wants to talk about this. Of course not -- it would force them to recognize that US forces are a power for GOOD and PEACE in that region.
2007-09-08 07:45:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by SMBR 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yea that is what I want, you are delaying the inevitable as this is a never ending conflict and the warring factions have the whole Middle East to draw from for recruitment. Some 340 million, which is a larger population than the US!
Exactly what are we accomplishing there that would be any different than if we were not? Don't say oil!
This is a sectarian civil war with ALL of the factions seeing es as the bad guys! Nothing is going to be resolved with us there unless you want to start a draft, put the country under a US backed dictator with us as his army. Hell we have already done that in Iraq and Iran (Hussein and the Shaw of Iran)! We even kicked out an elected government in Iran so we could get the oil!
2007-09-08 14:47:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It would be a disaster. Iraq would crumble. The U.S. Military is working to build up the Iraqi Defense Forces so they can take over their own country. What people don't get is the U.S. Military is having to start from the ground up and build an Iraqi Defense Force. The Al Anbar Province is approx. 1/3 the size of Iraq, and the progress there is incredible. We will succeed, we are America. Don't get discouraged, stand up for what you believe in.
2007-09-08 14:51:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by freedom_isn't free 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
CNN wouldn't be able to report from Iraq that day but they might report on Iraq. If they were in Iraq they couldn't hire enough body guards to keep their crews from losing their heads.....I'm guessing if that occured the Islamic fundamentalist would kill about 25,000 to 100,000 in the 1st 24 hours. Anyone that "ever" even thought about supporting the US contingency would be killed and their bodies dragged through the streets and left on the edges of town to show people whats coming.
2007-09-08 14:48:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its not possible to organise a co-ordinated pull out of all the men and equipment, it took months / years to get them in they will leave the same way over time, in bribs and drabs.
A pull-out would trigger all out civil war amongst the Iragi's with IRAN marching in to pick up the pieces.
2007-09-08 15:15:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
bush, bush, bush. I happened to have voted for him and I still believe that he is doing what is right .... But its time to bring ours back to were they belong enough is enough. We the USA didnot put these people in the positions that they are in. let them handle their own country. I say enough is enough. Briinngg oouurr ttrroooppss hhoommee.
2007-09-08 14:49:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by jay m 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
make all you people happy. you will never please everyone. and will will never withdraw 100% we will have special operation and the cia and other intelligence agencies will probably always be there.
2007-09-08 14:46:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋