Evolutionists, how do you explain this?

Question

The Theory of Evolutionology says that organisms have been using evolution to change for millions of years. But prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri told me that evolution was invented by Charles Darwin in the 1800's. So how could organisms use evolution before it was invented?

You don't hear about anybody flying in a plane before the invention of the plane. But evolutionists expect us to believe that people could use evolution before evolution was even invented. Do they really expect us to believe that evolution was invented in the 1800's but somehow was still used before that?

Does evolution have a time machine? Could it go back in time and get used by a bunch of organisms before it was invented? That's the only way that evolution could have been used by a bunch of organisms before it was invented.

Since evolution could not have been used before it was invented, the Bible is literally true.

Answer 1

The theory evolved into the form of a flux capacitor which did allow time travel. This has been known since the 80s.

Answer 2

Professor Adjineri is wrong again. (He's quite a guy!)

You don't have to have a scientific explanation for something before you can use it. If it works, you can use it. The birds did not have a theory of flight, but they flew. Women did not know what made soap do what it does (many still don't), but they got their clothes clean anyway.

That's the difference between a discovery and an invention. Darwin DISCOVERED what the animals and plants had been doing through time. He did not invent the phenomenon, he merely described it in a way that made more sense than people who wrote before, such as Lamarck.

Answer 3

Prominent Creation Scientist Em Adjineri if full of that brown stinky stuff that comes out of a bull. For one thing , the title "creation scientist " is an oxymoron . There is nothing scientific about creation . Why doesn't he explain the mechanics of creating the entire universe . Just to say "god" can do anything doesn't do it.
To say that Darwin invented evolution, gives us a hint as to the condition of his brain . Evolution has been in effect for millions of years . Darwin simply brought it to the attention of science and the world .
Does he believe that Columbus "invented " America because no European knew of it before Columbus ?
I love to read the comments and ideas of intelligent people. This guy, or anyone who believes him does not qualify as intelligent .
Your closing statement, again refering to evolution as a recent invention does not say anything favorable about you .

Answer 4

you are trying to turn logic on it's head .If humans
discovered say, North pole about 150 years back,do you mean to say it wasn't existing before that?The term 'cancer' is a recent one but the malady was there before. Charles Darwin didn't invent evolution but just invented the terminology( a name) and I hope you understand the difference between the two.The meaning conveyed in Bible has a meaning of it's own and doesn't contradict theory of evolution per se.You need to delve deeper in to Bible,which
uses more of symbolism than a direct prose.

Answer 5

> "evolutionist believe that humans do not have a soul, and spirit and that we are completely accidentally formed by chance right?" No. [1] no field of science, evolution or otherwise, can comment on the existence of the soul. The soul, if it exists, is a non-physical phenomenon, and is therefore not open to investigation through science. [2] evolution is *not* "chance" or "accident", it is a process guided by natural selection, which is totally not random. > "how do they explain guilt? and saddness? and happiness?" Emotions are an important feature of our brains' function. We are social animals, so feelings of guilt, etc. are part of that socialisation (easily explained by evolution). And happiness/sadness/ etc. are also explainable as motivational drives for directing us towards (evolutionarily) advantageous behaviour. If we didn't feel happy or sad, there would be no reason to behave in specific ways. > "these are no functions of what we can see or explain." Sorry, but yes they are!

Answer 6

Evolution wasn't invented it was discovered (to find out about something that already exists) by Charles Darwin. And there is a hell of a lot of difference between inventing and discovering.

Answer 7

Their is a big difference between Theory of evolution and the Law of gravity... Theory means not yet proven. Law means can be widely used. So the evolution is still a theory, if man evolves many years from now we would look different I suppose. so thats why until now the evolution thing is still a theory. Clear?

Answer 8

LOL! Reel 'em in!

ADDENDA

"Their is a big difference between Theory of evolution and the Law of gravity... Theory means not yet proven. Law means can be widely used. [...] Clear? "

Somebody needs to go back to science class. A "theory" does not get "proved" then become a "law". A scientific theory is much more than a hypothesis, as you seem to think. Theories use laws to explain more general concepts.

BTW, there happens to be a Theory of Gravity, which happens to emcompass Newton's "laws". You might want to check it out before you drift off the planet.

"I used to answer their questions, but have grown out of it, I will not answer a fool in his folly."

Translation: I'm tired of being reamed.

Answer 9

Evolution was not invented- it is a discovered theory. Garavity was not understood until Isaac Newton came up with his laws of motion, but that doesn't mean that people were floating about in space until Newton dropped the apple from the tree, does it?

Answer 10

Evolution an invention? That's a new one on me. Is relativity an invention too then? Silly Billy