Smallpox, malaria, yellow feaver, typhus, anthrax, cholera, bubonic plague......These are all part of nature too. if you think we should save wolves and bears and stuff, why dont I see any campaigns to save these organisms? Talk about hypocritical.
2007-09-02 13:41:07 · 7 answers · asked by enders_shadow90 2 in Environment ➔ Conservation
Interestingly enough, several years ago, the CDC was going to destroy the only remaining sample of the small pox virus, but PETA took out an injunction, saying it was the last of the species.
2007-09-02 14:19:17 · answer #1 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
there still might be "samples" of those in labs I am not quite sure but I think there are and anyways I don't know the point of saving something that can kill hundreds of people. Of course i think they shouldnt get rid of them for good but still keep samples to study. Anyways bears and wolves don't kill many people. We should help save every type of living creature no matter how dangerous and "bad" it is to help preserve nature.
2007-09-02 22:14:56 · answer #2 · answered by prabha G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That has to be the the dumbest thing yet. The last time I can down with a fever, it sure as hell wasn't caused by a bear or wolf....
2007-09-03 17:27:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
excuse me.. who would save organisms like those which could kill or cause people harm. In Biology, if you took it up, there are pathogenic and unpathogenic organisms. Some are beneficiary to humans and some organisms are not.
2007-09-03 05:06:12 · answer #4 · answered by raindrops_ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you wanna save something that can kill hundreds of thousands of ppl in days animals dont do that
2007-09-02 21:06:29 · answer #5 · answered by drew d 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We do. We save them in little bottles.
2007-09-02 20:48:20 · answer #6 · answered by westfield47130 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tell me. Can you actually ask this question without lol?
2007-09-02 21:31:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋