Pentagon/US High Command Failure: More US Military lives in Iraq - put at Risk?

Question

The Pentagon / High Command failing to supply the US Iraq military with the preriquisite numbers of mine resistant armour protection vehicles!

More military lives put in jeopadry and unecessary / unacceptable risk. Production is on time; its a "delivery hang-up" (shipping).

The US Airforce has its fleet of massive cargo carriers. So why isn't the Pentagon insisting the High Command mobilisation them immediately to effect prompt delivery?

Why isn't President Bush kicking their ass (the high command)as well. Hes voicing "we'll stay there to we finish the job".

OK, Instead of spending more unnecessary Amercian and allied military lives - why not a co-ordinated airlift to do the job?

I hope everyone who see's this will rally round and throw their 10 cents in. All the military in Iraq need every ounce of support with this. Their lives are important to us. Damned the purse strings!

Hopefully the President will order it done with the upmost priority.

Gentlemen, I'm sure we all agree its priority. I'm not talking about ships. And I know the situation in Kuwait Port. I talking about Air Lifting into K or elsewhere in additon to Shiping. Am I to beleive no 1 understands the ? The US Airforce has the capability to do the job. The end result is saved Military lives - whats the hang up? Remember the Berlin Airlift / look at what was saved there.

Answer 1

Buddy, you really nailed it..! Seems like this kind of thing has been going on ever since we went into Iraq.

It's inexcusable to say the least, if not downright criminal.

Answer 2

there's no longer something new approximately this. the only exchange the liberal-left Dems have made on the grounds that spitting on the returning troops from Vietnam, is that now they declare to help the troops. it is not something extra advantageous than a flimsy safeguard they warfare to apply to exempt themselves from any form of grievance, questioning, or scrutiny. in the event that they theory for one minute they could ruin out with it lower back, they could be doing it in a heartbeat. they want desperately for Bush, and, by skill of extension, all Republicans to fail. to declare that the warfare is lost, on an identical time as our little little ones are nonetheless interior the theater of conflict is the basest, maximum vile, and out genuine egocentric type of political exploitation of the sacrifices those youthful ladies and adult males have had to undergo; insults, no longer merely them, yet all individuals by way of fact they're us. And yet, those very comparable self-important, self-anointed, living turds of a few mythical "ethical authority" have the unmitigated gall to declare to communicate for all the individuals of the country. In a pigs eye! no longer something will come of it. Do you think of that reid or pelosi will ever be asked to step down? needless to say no longer. they're liberal dems, and as such can say, or do, something they want and not a peep from the toadie press. once you think approximately that 80 according to-cent of the clicking are balloting democrats, what do you assume?

Answer 3

Explain what you would do to get them over there faster. (Remember that we can only unload one ship at a time in Kuwait).

Do you have any idea about the issues involved?

Answer 4

Despite your assertions, we just don't have the resources.

You want to ship vehicles. So, which shipments should be suspend -- food? bullets? new troops? body armor?

If you want to change the shipping schedules, something else needs to be pushed to a lower priority. What will it be?

Answer 5

Yeah, infact I hope they rebudget all the money going to welfare this month for the country to the war effort.