English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could we have that here? With no abusive reporting of people for disagreeing?

That is a cowardly little way of dealing with someone just because they say things you don't like to read. And it poisons things for real honest discussion and debate and yes maybe even learning something.

Who else is disgusted by abusive reporters and wants this to be a free and open forum??

2007-08-22 17:36:54 · 16 answers · asked by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7 in Politics & Government Immigration

Lets see if this question will be removed..

2007-08-22 17:45:08 · update #1

Full Disclosure: I have reported abuse before. One was on someone saying racist things here. The other was a perv over in Womens Health because there are other kids there.

2007-08-22 17:57:20 · update #2

Unfortunately I have begin to blok some people because I suspect them of being abusive reporters.

2007-08-22 17:59:56 · update #3

WAR_PATH you clearly have made up your mind what you think of me and what kind of person that you think I am. I don't know why you think that or why you connected to me if you don't like me.

Anyway you are free to vote for yourself in this question.

2007-08-23 07:42:02 · update #4

23 Aug 2007 03:02:38 -0700
Subject: WAR_PATH has connected to you on Yahoo! Answers

Hi ? ~Sigy~?,

You are WAR_PATH's newest Contact! If you don't know WAR_PATH, WAR_PATH is probably a fan of your questions and answers and wants to link to you so he/she can find them again. There is no obligation for you to reciprocate, unless you want to. :)

I don't mind if you conect to me I was just curious why you want to..

2007-08-24 07:12:26 · update #5

16 answers

I know, i was just answering a question from this guy named "PEANUTS" and he BLOCKED me. All i said is that he probably violated something, I forgot what I put. That guy was hit by the truth, just like his question stated.

He probably reported my answer too, and that's sad.

"spazz"-- you too? wow. and I know for a fact that i did not violate anything in my answer. I was explaining why I thought his questions and answers were being deleted. And i went back in and it said "You cannot view this question at this time.Back to Home My Profile." how sad.

2007-08-22 17:46:18 · answer #1 · answered by rmon 6 · 8 3

Yes that would be so nice if no one abused openness with Lie's, over exaggeration, way off analogies etc. Or abused their freedom of speech for power, control, manipulation etc.
And expected people to tolerate it. personally i have wanted to report someone in immigration for disagreeing but it would lose integrity by doing that. I have only reported one person a while ago for making clear and racist comments in a question to Afro Americans. And only had a few deleted answers because I answered in Spanish.

but it could get better in all three that you mentioned.

2007-08-22 18:33:52 · answer #2 · answered by bayarealatino925 2 · 4 0

I agree. I have only violated 2 people in the last 6 months. Both was guilty of harrassing people and targetted them with insults. There is one person who was trying to get me suspended, but I didn't even violate him. I am annoyed that people here complain about racism, but then violate people constantly. An open dialogue helps discover the root of racism and foster understanding. Beside if one group of people start violating, the other side retaliates. The most abusive ones just create new accounts.

2007-08-22 18:31:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

It was a free and open discussion board before the likes of Glitterbabeprincess. MEXICANS ARE THE BEST, MEXICANBABY, MACHOMAN, LeighAnn D, EL CHILI, RACIST REBEL, and many others came to the board. Then it became a forum of who could get who suspended first with bogus violations, then many times of suspensions.

None of them want to listen or learn anything except from who agrees with them alone. People always asking what do you think? Or Do you agree? Only to pick Best Answers from their own set of people that have a common agreement with. So why bother asking what others think if you are only going to choose those who agree with you. Or what you like in what they have said that goes along with your beliefs or opinions. For that type of discussion you can email each other back and forth.

And not all get reported for the disagreements. Try more like Not following YA's Community Guidelines and TOS. Could that be their biggest problem for being reported?! I certainly think it is. But you won't pick this answer, or any other that disagrees with you on the reasons for reporting abuse. Because you have already made up your mind of which member from your group of friends you'll be choosing as best answer.

So although I got my 2 whoopy doo points for answering. I have still wasted my time here in doing so.

added - Would like to know what you're talking about. I'm not connected to you. I base my response on how you and your friends all stick together. I have yet to see any of you choose anyone who opposes your ideas or arguments.

2007-08-22 23:25:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

in accordance to many scholars Muhammad became a schizophrenic, which if even partly genuine makes a definitive case against the Koran and all that observed and referred to as itself Islam. Theological scholars irritate the allegations against Muhammad by using putting forward that his hallucinations and rantings have been extra corrupted by using the devil, by way of fact the genuine angel of God, Gabirel, ought to no longer have dictated the blunders, inconsistencies, and evil usual interior the Quran. The argument is shown by using definition, the defintion of the Gabriel entity, first revealed interior the e book of Daniel. The angel Gabriel informs the prophet that there will be 4 Persian kings until now the appearance of Alexander the excellent. Daniel 11:2-4: "And now will I shew thee the actuality. Behold, there shall get up yet 3 kings in Persia; and the fourth would be a ways richer than all of them: and by using his potential by using his riches he shall stir up all against the area of Grecia. And a effective king shall get up, that shall rule with great dominion, and do in accordance to his will. And whilst he shall get up, his kingdom would be broken, and could be divided in the direction of the 4 winds of heaven." QED. All claims made by using Islamic leaders must be seen with great warning!

2016-10-16 13:20:24 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Any forum that tries to self-police is just lazy. The actual moderators really don't care as long as they get paid.

Some juvenile persons like to play with your mind. They probably are just children playing online. Or if they are really adults with an agenda, take it as a compliment to see that someone fears your persuasive words and can only respond with cowardly censorship.

They have no brains and it only takes 5 seconds to report abuse rather than take a few minutes to come up with a decent response.

You must be doing something right,

or left, as the case may be....

2007-08-22 17:53:37 · answer #6 · answered by Frindofo 3 · 7 2

Well, I for one am disgusted, but I'm sure it's not going to change any time soon!Like I said before, if I don't agree with somebody, then I give a thumbs down. That's as far as I go, I don't report people or block them from answering my questions, that is just childish, at least in my eyes.

Let's see how many thumbs down I can get for being honest and truthful!

I'm not blocked from "peanut" yet, but dirty martini and outrageous 5 blocked me, and I a few more whom I don't really know!

2007-08-22 17:52:39 · answer #7 · answered by LeighAnn D 4 · 8 4

Yes it is getting ridiculous, it seems that both sides are trying to silence the other side.

This issue isn't going to go away, it gotten too big. We need to talk about it and stop accusing each other of TOS violations when you lose an argument.

2007-08-23 16:03:51 · answer #8 · answered by drixnot2 2 · 1 3

Ok with me. I never agree with ole Peanuts but he hasn't blocked me.. wooo hoo. It is partly Yahoo's fault for removing things that clearly are not violations. People do it because they are allowed to.

2007-08-22 17:56:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

Unfortuanately the pro-amnesty for illegals bunch, to be frank, hates the greatest nation on earth (the United States) and want to erase our border in need of a "great wall" per say, and want a slave labor force to do their work cheap. Do the politicos actually care about the little guy? No. They care about their pocket book. And the little guys who support illegal immigration? Either they are illegal aliens themselves, rich fat cats who haven't got to worry about losing their jobs, or metally handicapped and dangerously insane.

2007-08-22 20:46:20 · answer #10 · answered by The Instant Classic 2 · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers