not to abort because of pressure from a anti-abortion group?
This is 100% curiosity.....I'm past child-bearing years.
2007-08-22 12:09:08 · 18 answers · asked by daljack -a girl 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
devil's advocate....maybe pregnancy is the problem.
2007-08-22 12:20:39 · update #1
most Anti-Abortion groups only care about the Fetus/ un-born child. after it is born it does not matter anymore. just drop it in an orphanage and wish it the best in it's life of community bedrooms, no personnel belongings, lack of education, and quite possibly homelessness after the age of 18.
2007-08-22 12:16:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
The parents. When you bring a child into this world, you are responsible for said child (unless you give it up for adoption) until the age of 18. As the mother of a 22 year-old, I can assure you that the financial obligations continue long after the 18th birthday.
2007-08-22 12:15:09 · answer #2 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The man is always responsible for both the woman and the child. We wouldn't be in the mess we're in if men didn't wimp out so much.
2007-08-22 12:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by High Flyer 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
If you are the father than yes- unless you decide to cut all ties to her and the baby. If you sign away your parental rights, then you don't have to support the baby. You really should sign your rights away anyway, because if you would suggest her murdering the baby, then you don't care about it- That baby deserves parents who love it, not parents who want to murder it.
You should have thought about this issue before you had sex. That is the time to decide if you want to be a daddy or not. After she is pregnant than it is too late. You should be celibate, if you don't want to be a daddy- if you can't control yourself, then the doctor can fix it so you can't be a daddy anymore.
2007-08-22 12:34:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think the people that fought for her to keep the baby-- if not, there wouldn't be another mouth to feed. If you fight for something to live, then that something becomes your responsibility. As in, if you fight for a dog not to get euthanized, that dog is now your pet to take care of. I know a kid is not a dog, but the same rules apply. A life is a life.
I'm happy vasectomies exist. Me and my man are adopting all the kids the anti-abortionists won't. I don't want kids, but I do fully support abortions. It's a woman's body and her choice.
2007-08-22 12:21:02 · answer #5 · answered by mathaowny 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
The parents, just like any other kid. She made her decision, not the anti-abortion group. And she always had the option of giving the child up for adoption.
2007-08-22 12:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
The same as any child whose mother did not consider abortion. The mother and father.
2007-08-22 12:15:32 · answer #7 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Daddy
2007-08-22 12:35:15 · answer #8 · answered by Cee T 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The responsibility would be both the parents regardless
2007-08-22 12:18:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
the mother and the father is responsible. that's her child, if she does not want the baby then she gave give the baby up for adoption then it will be in the care of the state. its the law....the parent(s) are REQUIRED to take care of their child.
2007-08-22 12:19:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋