3
2007-08-22 12:06:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
2
2007-08-22 12:07:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
3
2007-08-22 12:07:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a disturbing trend of scientists, teachers, and students coming under attack for expressing support in the theory of intelligent design, or even just questioning evolution. The freedom of scientists, teachers, and students to question Darwin's theory, or to express alternative scientific hypothesis is coming under increasing attack by people that can only be called Darwinian fundamentalists.”
New Ben Stein Flick, Expelled, Blows the Whistle on the Evolution.
Expelled is a disturbing new documentary that will shock anyone who thinks all scientists are free to follow the evidence wherever it may lead.
http://www.expelledthemovie.com/
2007-08-23 03:25:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
interesting survey. Evolution makes extra sense than creationism. Evolution is a scientific theory, it has evidence and it makes predictions which could be verified (each and every scientific theory desires this). Creationism has no evidence- for a commence if we took the Bible at face fee the Earth is basically 6000 years previous and dinosaurs have been planted the two by using devil to tempt us into technology and faraway from God (that rattling devil lol) or by using God to objective our faith. i do no longer understand approximately you yet i'm extra liable to have self assurance all that geology and sturdy evidence than a narrative. the ingredient is creationism replaced right into a narrative written an extremely long term in the past to describe issues human beings have been interested in yet did no longer understand, why ought to we instruct in basic terms a sort of memories? If we are chuffed to instruct one then why don't you instruct all of them from the main important religious ones to the hundreds from tiny villages around the international? Evolution ought to study in each and every college technology type inspite of faith by using fact the lesson is technology no longer faith. Creationism can not at all be observed as technology. I stay contained in the united kingdom and we've the bonus of having religious analyze instructions so that's not such a controversy right here- evolution belongs contained in the technology lecture room, creationism contained in the religious analyze instructions.
2016-10-03 02:15:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by belvin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) No.
2) Not phrased like that.
3) NO!
I TRUST in evolution as the fact it is.
Also, humans are animals. We're primates of the family Hominidae.
2007-08-22 12:09:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe in God. Evolution is mostly an American, British and German thing actually. It was used to express racism as well. Hitler was a prime example of its evil implications. Science is good to explain things like the 1s and 0s of technology, optic nerves, and digestion. But when people tack the word science to such a philosophy as evolution. That's just stupid.
2007-08-22 12:15:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by F'sho 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
1 not any longer because i am an orphan in search of information and it distresses me that no one helps. because helping Me would be seen by God (who i don't beleive created the pysical matter in the universe) as a pure religous act.
2 evolution is more correct then some man-thing using clay to make a man.
2007-08-22 12:09:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
3. Both but leaning wayyyy closer to evolution.
And man is an animal. Why do so many people crack Homo Sapiens to be so specail???
2007-08-22 12:18:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by MyNameAShadi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of the above
Religion is an organization and I believe in no organization.
Evolution has tried to trick people to many times to be believed, real science doesn't do this.
2007-08-22 12:10:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sean 7
·
0⤊
1⤋