English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

where are the evidence? And no references to science which waz written by ppl with reasons.

2007-08-22 05:23:16 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

nbaallstar1o1 UR right!

Being a Christian ROCKs!

N ur right when you say why do we not see man stop evolving from a monkey. If evolutions were true then by now we shud have seen a monkey become a man become a man with a rock in his head and a rock evolve a wing and become a new creature.

But we don;'t see this bcuz they know evolution is false.

LOl all the atheitz do is talk about books when if they read the Bible they wud see that their books R the false ones. Y do they use the word THEIORY! LOLOLOL!!!!111

2007-08-22 05:42:33 · update #1

43 answers

my pastor said something thats true and funny one time. he said, "lots of ppl say they don't believe the Bible because it was written by people", so he said to reply to that say, "well, who wrote what you believe in?". haha


i'm a Christian, and it rocks!


and another thing, if evolution was true (which its not) then why aren't animals still turning into ppl? why did it only happen back when ever u evolutionists think it happened?

2007-08-22 05:28:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

You want to give a scientific meaning to words in the Bible that had no scientific aim. If the Catholic Church defends evolution, why is it that the fundamentalist Christians can't wake up to the truth that evolution is a fact. The domestic house cat evolved from an African, Arabian and European wild cats in just 5,000 years. Dogs evolved in just the past 50,000 years. We won't even begin to talk about other domesticated animals like Jersey dairy cows, fainting goats, etc. I am sure those were all running around in the Garden of Eden in your world view.

Let's turn this around, where in the Bible does it say that evolution is forbidden by God?

2007-08-22 05:34:08 · answer #2 · answered by khrome_wind 5 · 0 0

Evolution is a very weak "science" if it is science at all.. Here are two quick reasons why..

1. There wasn't enough time for the small rodent like mammals left after the last extinguishing event to bring them to the size and variety of the mammals the roamed the earth during the last major ice age.
2. Viruses have been known to man for approximately the last 200 years. During that time there have been billions of generations, yet never has a virus jumped species. Yes the have varied but they remain viruses.. Jim

2007-08-22 05:38:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hindu belief has no dis agreement with evolution.
The intelligence or force that CAUSES evolution is what is refered to as God or some see it as scenice.
Please --this not a pathetic attempt to claim Hinduism is better than any other religion. Research into all the sayings and pronouncements in all religions and they all say the same thing in either a crude way or a refined way. Tribal people in olden times with no formal education had to be told things by putting fear in them and others by other means.

2007-08-22 05:44:03 · answer #4 · answered by lunistan 2 · 0 0

Where is the evidence that creation is true? And no references to the bible which "waz" written by people with reasons.

Science is more than words written in your textbook by the way. Science IS evidence.

2007-08-22 05:28:56 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Astarte 5 · 2 0

What do you mean with no references to science? It's like someone asking if God is real than were is the evidence, with no reference to the bible because it was written by people with reasons. Silly you.

Here's ONE example of evolution that has to do with the eye. Though it is science, it is written by observations of scientists that are comparing one thing to another not their own personal reasoning


http://www.livescience.com/animals/051118_animal_eyes.html

2007-08-22 05:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Evolution is a scientific theory. The evidence in support of a scientific theory is, by its very nature, scientific.

You appear to be asking for evidence, then, which is not evidence. This might be convenient for you, but defies reason.

How do you manage to get dressed in the morning?

2007-08-22 05:28:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

So, you want evidence of a scientific theory without reference to science? OK, then, just look around and you'll see tons of it, but you won't recognize or acknowledge it, so why bother?

BTW, I think you meant to say that science was written by people with reason, not reasons.

2007-08-22 05:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I find it tragically funny that people use computers to explain why they want to return to the Dark Ages.



*
* On the new 1-5 drink scale

2007-08-22 05:32:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what??? okay maybe i'm not understanding your question, but what i gather from you questions, is that evolution has no evidence and no references to science. but, to ask something like that one would be a person that has never read a science book, never went to school or just a plain idiot.

2007-08-22 05:30:22 · answer #10 · answered by RuG™ 3 · 1 0

I just saw you demand "rocks with wings" and "trees with eyes" in another question. You thought their absence was evidence that evolution is false.

2007-08-22 05:27:13 · answer #11 · answered by The Son of Man 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers