solar panels of course, I haven't heard of anything better!
2007-08-14 13:43:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by nocateman 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Passive solar heating through the use of slanted south facing windows would be the most efficient use of solar energy in the home. Probably more efficient than that would be using plants to grow food.
2007-08-14 18:38:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by joecool123_us 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Answers here are likely to be subjective, but I'll give it a go. Here's my thoughts,
Efficient use is a relative thing; it depends on who you are asking. Someone who is aiming for more independence from the electric company would tell you that efficient use is any that allows people to harness the sun. A weekend camper might claim that efficient use are those portable solar panels one can take along on a trip to run their stereo or cell phone charger. For a novel I'm writing, I am researching joining tidal power and solar together, in order that remote villages might have cheaper power. Anyone in such a village would claim their setup is the most efficent use.
If I were asked, I would have to say the most efficient use is one that is extensive, far reaching,moving and one that teaches the powers that be that we do not need to be dependant on huge power plants.
2007-08-14 15:45:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by dragonquillca 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Efficient USE of solar energy?
That would be growing plants.
2007-08-14 15:10:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
We use them extensively in our living house - bathing room, bedrooms, workroom, hallway, front porch. Downsides: a million. the sunshine from CFLs is regularly greater obvious than incandescent lighting fixtures (in fact this is nearer to actual sunlight hours - yet actual sunlight hours is doubtless greater good on the eyes of people used to yellowish incandescent lighting fixtures). you may, besides the undeniable fact that, purchase 'organic gentle' CFLs that atone for this. 2. the sunshine output claimed (e.g. such as a 70 watt incandescent bulb) now and returned is puffed up. regularly a CFL is 4 cases greater effectual than an incandescent (so a 13 watt CFL is almost a fifty two watt incandescent) yet manufacturers often declare 5 cases greater effectual. 3. They incorporate a tiny volume of poisonous mercury. this is not a project in case you act responsibly and recycle the bulb (e.g. at your interior of reach construction center, or seek for suggestion out of your municipal waste administration branch for recycling centers). in case you purely toss a fluorescent gentle interior the rubbish you're polluting the ecosystem. in case you injury a CFL, do no longer project, this is not a important poisonous clean-up, yet shop on with careful strategies to bathe it so which you do no longer contaminate your self. 4. they might burn out swifter than they declare (decrease than the marketed 8,000 hours) quite in the event that they are in ceiling furniture, held horizontal. they are truly designed for vertical installations. I additionally think of a few low fee manufacturers in simple terms don't have the primary to final that long. in case you come across a style that lasts, persist with it. respected manufacturers like Philips and GE are a greater suitable wager than in-keep, regularly occurring, or low fee chinese language manufacturers (even although maximum of them are made in China besides). 5. some CFLs can not be dimmed on a primary dimmer swap (doing so burns the bulbs out swifter). besides the undeniable fact so which you may purchase a dimmer swap that works with fluorescent lighting fixtures, or CFL lighting fixtures that paintings with a primary dimmer swap, to paintings around this project. of direction there are a number of pluses to capability effectual bulbs, which an prolonged way outweigh the hazards in any difficulty the place you employ the sunshine greater effective than an hour an afternoon.
2016-12-13 07:48:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Letting sunlight into your house in winter to warm it, and blocking it in summer to keep it cool.
If you're building a house, a lot of south facing windows with a roof overhang that shades them in summer, but lets the Sun shine in in winter.
Very low cost, very effective, especially in a sunny climate.
2007-08-14 17:36:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bob 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
solar heating- home or water.
solar electric is still not economical OR efficient.
2007-08-14 17:42:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by afratta437 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is the most efficient and the cheapest
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/891177.html
This link is in hebrew - this system is 1500 cheapeas then any other system
2007-08-15 19:14:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vegetables for food and trees for air.
2007-08-15 02:28:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have lots of info that I think you will find quite helpful and enlightening:
http://ecowellness.multiply.com/ for excellent inspirational info within my blog to help not only our world and its creatures, but to also open peoples hearts and minds to many amazing wonders that life has to offer. I also have lots of info in my blog to help fuel peoples imaginations to many possibilities that can be found only in the minds eye.
Along with lots of environmental info, amazing environmental pictures and videos (These videos show the beauty of this world and what life can be like if people take the time to appreciate life’s true beauty).
Let us all strive for a greener/brighter future by helping to create a solid foundation for future generations to build upon, so we can hand them a beautiful world, filled with never ending awe and wonders!!
Where peoples differences and uniqueness are accepted, where we all live as one, helping one another so that we can all play our own mysteriously beautiful melodies in the never ending, awe inspiring, song of life :-)
I truly have faith in humanity and believe that someday our lives and the world in which we live will truly be transformed for the better.
2007-08-14 14:32:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Qweemawva Anzorla Qwartoon (Male) 3
·
1⤊
4⤋