English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why do those enviromental types only care about cute fuzzy animals? why not save the horseshoe crab?

2007-08-13 19:01:17 · 17 answers · asked by ? 4 in Environment Conservation

17 answers

I don't know what you're talking about...

My pet cockroach is extremely cute...

(See what you've down, now...?!?)

You've hurt his feelings...

2007-08-13 20:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Why should we protect animals that cannot even protect themselves? Waste of money Ignores human suffering Although it would be nice to protect the endangered species from becoming extinct, it’s a natural process of evolution. The “fittest” doesn’t depend on whether a species is strong, big, or cunning vs. those which are not, “fittest” means those who are adaptable and capable of passing on their genes to offsprings and etc. Trying to save species that cannot survive in its environment Sometimes science isn’t perfect and Nature is just inexplicable and beyond our control. No sense in ignoring suffering members of our own species and meddling with other endangered species. It’s unrealistic to save every single animal. There are more pressing problems (SE Cupp) Something new will crop up, as always. We wouldn’t be here if the dinosaurs were still alive Most of the critically endangered species no longer affect the food chain because of its decrease in numbers. Of the many animals that qualifies to be on the endangered species list, only 1% actually taken out of it. 41,415 species are on the endangered species list, so what impact is our billions of dollars spent on trying to save endangered species doing? Why can’t we just let it go? That’s the circle of life. Animals who cannot adapt to their changing environments die. I understand that the intentions are good, but haven’t we done enough at manipulating nature? I think that saving animals is nothing more than people s attempts at trying to control nature, well, more so than we already have.

2016-05-17 08:20:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

whether a species is endangered should definitely not be determined by whether it's cute of not. However, i am quite sure roaches are no way near extinction. X)

But one thing about insects is that they are too small, difficult to track and identify. Some unknown species are extinct already before we even heard of it.

I guess most endangered species are "cute fuzzy" or really attractive types like lions and leopards because they are noticeable and many people know them, thus more willing to help to save them.
But in my opinion, all endangered animals should be protected, for the sake of the diversity of species and balance of nature.

2007-08-13 20:46:07 · answer #3 · answered by jkzxq 1 · 1 0

Roaches are far from being endangered.
They are probably one of the best equipped critters on Earth when it comes to survival.
They will eat anything, even you if given the chance. You don't even have to be dead for them to try to eat you.
Just sleep on the floor for a few nights in an area infested with roaches and you will find out personally that what I say is true.

2007-08-13 19:08:28 · answer #4 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2 0

First of all, I don't think there is anything we could do to make cockroaches an endangered species. If all the worlds Nukes were to explode, and virtually all life ended, cockroaches would be one of the few survivors.

I dont care much for ladybugs either, but if they stay outta my way, and my home, then there no need to worry about being squished.

2007-08-13 19:07:07 · answer #5 · answered by rushmore223 5 · 2 0

Roaches are not endangered, neither are lady bugs. If horseshoe crabs are indeed endangered (which would make sense due to pollution and habitat depletion) then I'm sure that there are environmentalists and naturalists working on the problem.

When you say the words "those environmental types", you sound like a goon. Just thought you should know. :-\

2007-08-13 21:47:05 · answer #6 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 0 2

Roaches are far from being endangered species, but if they do become endangered, I think we should try to save them. Every species is important; remove one from the face of the earth, and you risk upsetting our planet's ecological balance.

2007-08-13 19:13:12 · answer #7 · answered by redgem18 2 · 1 0

because the cute fuzzy animals are near extinction because humans find them so cute they would kill them to place them as throphies at home? if they are not near extinction, human couldn't care less about them. But still, if human treat animals badly, the animal right activist would step in.

2007-08-14 02:38:43 · answer #8 · answered by sunshine 3 · 0 0

Roaches can live without their heads attached to their bodies for up to a week. I don't see why anyone would want or need to save them. They've been here before we got here, and they'll be here after we leave. If you want to "save" them - go have at it. I think they're gross.

2007-08-13 19:11:08 · answer #9 · answered by ♥michele♥ 7 · 2 0

they are the least endangered species on this planet ,and will probably be the last things left alive after global disasters of any description.

2007-08-13 19:27:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Look, if ladybugs invaded my house when the lights went out and tried to get into my food, I would want them dead too. Roach's are disgusting and carry diseases. Being ugly doesn't help either.

2007-08-13 19:05:02 · answer #11 · answered by Cat 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers