Jack, you asked, "Meg, perhaps you can answer the question, at least the separation of Church and State components and the Church's position on it, instead of taking a small portion of the document and holding it up as an example of the whole?"
I would, but you have blocked me. Dirty pool, Jack.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlewmKV1utu.1ieuVwsFJ8Hd7BR.?qid=20070725233740AAMnKn5
2007-07-25 20:33:14 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
As I wrote earlier, I need to locate an English translation of Acerbissimum before I can give a decent answer. How can I be expected to comment on a document I haven't read?
2007-07-25 20:41:40 · update #1
Vitamin C: No, and you can't even look at your answer unless you are signed out. Signed in, you are told, "You cannot view this question at this time."
2007-07-25 22:01:03 · update #2
I wouldn't bother answering any of his questions Meg.
He is a person that has all the answers.
My guess ...is he has a problem with women giving answers.
2007-07-25 20:40:24 · answer #1 · answered by repent 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The Bible says we are to be salt and light. And salt and light means not just in the church and not just as a teacher or as a pastor or a banker or a lawyer, but in government. We have to have elected officials in government and we have to have the faithful in government. And over time, that lie we have been told about the separation of church and state, people have internalized, thinking that they needed to avoid politics. That is so wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers. And if we are the ones not actively involved in electing those godly men and women and if people aren’t involved in helping godly men in getting elected than we’re going to have a nation of secular laws. That’s not what our founding fathers intended and that’s certainly isn’t what God intended.
2007-07-26 09:41:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't you still have the ability to add details in your answer to that particular question? If I'm wrong please tell me, because I haven't ever had direct experience with being blocked.
2007-07-26 04:05:58 · answer #3 · answered by Tea 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it's actually futile to give decent answers to people like him. they think they are already all-knowing. don't bother.
2007-07-26 03:43:15 · answer #4 · answered by Perceptive 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No idea sis!
2007-07-26 06:49:06 · answer #5 · answered by Sniper 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're not answering anything; you're dissecting and criticizing. There's a difference.
2007-07-26 03:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jack B, sinistral 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋