Why God instead of came to earth din´t sent one of the sons he has in heaven?

Question

cause all angels are sons of God you can see it in the book of Genesis 6:1, Job 1:6 and 2:1, and all of them are messenger and servants of him (Hebrew 1:14), why he didn´t sent his more trustable and powerful of that sons, they are eternal, also they are superior to human beings also they have no sin and Adam was a created being like them in that case equally created by God as angels but with less power, why the most poweful being of the universe need to come to earth to save creature that are lower than his first sons, they sin came by a man induced by an angel not by an almighty God, it is not to much for just to little beings?

Why maybe he didn´t sent the first of that sons?

SORRY English is not my native language

I am not asking about Jesus I did a Qs, please attach to the question, thanks.

God almighty also wasn´t a human.

Everybody who has free will is capable to sin.

Tuberoot : Angels are crested beings also Adam ws created being in thst term they are equal but angels accoding to the bible are superior to humans, so, sorry but is not a valid argument.

Hebrew 1:8 " But with reference to the Son: “God is your throne forever and ever, and [the] scepter of your kingdom is the scepter of uprightness. 9 You loved righteousness, and you hated lawlessness. That is why God, your God, anointed you with [the] oil of exultation more than your partners.” 10 And: “You at [the] beginning, O Lord, laid the foundations of the earth itself, and the heavens are [the] works of your hands

Answer 1

John ch.3 v.16: For God (Jehovah) so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
How beautiful of a scripture to remember!


Dear Roman & Geezah, the two of you, go and buy the book of virtues and in between reading your Bible, study that one too.

Answer 2

Because Jesus is the only one worthy enough to do it. The angels couldn't do it. They did not have the ability.

The angels were created by God. They could be called the sons of God in that way. But Jesus is the one and only BEGOTTEN Son. He was different because He is also God. The Jews knew what Jesus was saying in the Gospel of John chapter 8 and in chapter 10. They were going to try to kill him for saying it. "Though you being a man, you make yourself God!" They told him.

So God Himself did come to earth. It's just that people aren't used to seeing it that way.

I am glad that you brought up Hebrews 1. Because in Hebrews 1 it also says:
8But about the Son he says,
"Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy."

God called Jesus God.

Answer 3

Because angels aren't human- they couldn't make the sacrifice- they can't die. Jesus had to made human so He could die. And angels aren't always perfect. One third of the angels in heaven rebelled against God and fell. So they are obviously capable of sin. But the son of God is not capable of sin, and so He alone could be the perfect sacrifice God needed in order to redeem man once and for all, since the blood of goats and bulls couldn't. Animals are not enough payment for man- only a perfect man could be a perfect sacrifice.

Answer 4

Jesus is God you twit, who is more powerful the creator or the created? It's the fact that Jesus did not resist, he did it because that was the only way. Jesus made a consciencious desciscion to die for us. We are saved by grace because he did not have to die he could have just started over. But He didn't He died for us and spent eternity in HEll in Four Hours to pay for our blood.

Answer 5

Why maybe somebody a book on grammar and sentence structure send you?

Answer 6

Grammer error, no offence

Answer 7

Is Jesus the Son of God?
Matthew 3:17 could be used by some Christians to support the divine Sonship of Jesus. If Matthew 3:17, "And Lo a voice for heaven, saying, this is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased," is used to support divine Sonship, then there should be no other verse that contradicts or gives equal divine Sonship to another person or persons in the Old or New Testament. However, many references were found in the Old and New Testaments that mentioned someone other than Jesus as having a divine Sonship to God. See Exodus 4:22: "Israel is my son, even my firstborn." II Samuel 7:14 and I Chronicles 22:10: "...and he shall be my son (Solomon)." Jeremiah 31:9: "...and Ephraim is my firstborn." Also, Psalm 2:7.

What ‘Son’ and ‘Father’ Means?
The word "Son" must not be accepted literally because God addresses many of his chosen servants as son and sons. The Jews have also claimed Ezra to be the Son of God. The New Testament Greek words used for "son" (pias and paida, which mean servant or son in the sense of servant) are translated as son in reference to Jesus and as servant in reference to others in some translations of the Bible.
Further, the term "Father" as used by Jesus corresponds more closely to the term Rabb, i.e. One who nourishes and sustains, so that in Jesus’ doctrine, God is "Father" – Nourisher and Sustainer – of all men. The New Testament also interprets "son of God" to be mystical: "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." (Romans 8:14).

Had God two begotten sons?
This mystical suggestion is further supported with Jesus being called the only begotten Son of God. In Psalm 2:7, the Lord said to David: "...Thou art my son: this day have I begotten thee."
Does this mean that God had two sons? Jesus also said that God is not only his Father but also your Father (Matthew 5:45, 48). Luke 3:38 says: "...Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the Son of God."
Who is mentioned in Hebrews 7:3 as like unto the Son of God? It is Melchisedec, King of Salem, as mentioned in Hebrews 7:1. He (Melchisedec) is more unique than Jesus or Adam. Why is he not preferred to be the Son of God? Moreover, Adam did not have a mother or father, but was the first human being created by God and in the likeness of God to exist in the Garden of Eden and on earth. Wouldn’t this give more rights to Adam to be called the Son of God in its truest meaning?

People think Jesus is god but he says “Why do you call me good”? Can god be not good?
I would like to share with you an obvious contradiction between John 3:16, Luke 10:25-28 and Matthew 19:16-17. John 3:16 reads: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten, Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
Now let’s read Luke 10:25-28: And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, what is written in the law? How readest Thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and Thou shalt live.

Why demons and damned people think Jesus is son of god?
In Luke 4:41, Jesus refused to be called the Son of God by demons. Do you think that Jesus would rebuke the demons, or anyone else for that matter, for telling the truth? Unquestionably, no! Jesus rebuked the demons because they were saying something false by calling him the Son of God. Also, if the demons knew that Jesus was the Christ, for Jesus to shut them up because they called him the Christ is a contradiction to Jesus’ mission.
In Luke 9:20 & 21, Jesus said unto his disciples:
"But who say ye that I am? Peter answered saying, "The Christ of God, and Jesus straightly charged them and commanded them to tell no man that thing."
Furthermore, verses like John 3:2, John 6:14, John 7:40, Matthew 21:11, Luke 7:16 and 24:19 confirm that Jesus accepted the title of teacher, Prophet and called himself the son of man in Matthew 8:20, 12:40, 17:9 & 12, 26:24, Luke 9:26, 22:48, 22:69, and 24:7. The most conclusive verse that says Jesus is the son (servant) of man is Mark 14:26 where Jesus is mentioning the Day of Reckoning. Jesus specifically said we would see the son of man, not the Son of God, sitting in the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Is there any single, unequivocal statement in the Bible whereby Jesus himself declares, "I am God, therefore worship me."
The act of begetting is a physical act and such act is against God’s nature. The Qur’an 19:35 says:
"It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! When He determines a matter He only says to it "Be," and it is." (Maryam 19:35)
The teachings of Jesus as the Son of God were not preached by Jesus nor accepted by Jesus, but were taught by Paul as supported in Acts 9:20: "And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God." Did Jesus ever claim to be God or say, "Here am I, your God, worship me"? The answer is no. For there is no single, unequivocal statement in the Bible whereby Jesus himself declares, "I am God, therefore worship me." Virtually all of the more than two thousand verses of the epistles of Paul are his own fabrications to include Romans 9:5 that says, depending upon which Bible you read: "...Christ came, who is overall, the eternally blessed God."

Gospels of Paul.
Christians should know that Paul himself mentions his own gospel, not Jesus, in his epistle to the Romans when he says in Romans 2:16: "In the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel."
In face, the Pauline epistle to the Romans serves as the foundation of today’s Christianity. Thus, it is the Christians whose efforts will be wasted in this life as they think they were acquiring good by their works when they attribute partners to God, as stated in Chapter 18:103-106 of the Qur’an: "Say: Shall we tell you of those who lost most in respect of their deeds? Those whose efforts have been wasted in this life, while they thought that they were acquiring good by their works?" they are those who deny the Signs of their Lord and the fact of their having to meet Him (in the Hereafter): vain will be their works, nor shall We, on the Day of judgment, give them any weight. That is their reward, Hell; because they rejected Faith, and took My Signs and My Messengers by way of jest. (Al-Kahf 18:103-106)

Was Saint Paul a ‘prophet’.
Indeed, it is so strange and ironic, knowing that none of Paul’s epistle to the Romans, more than 430 verses, were ever formulated by Jesus. Paul should have made direct reference to the pristine teachings of Jesus, if only the former claim for apostleship by divine inspiration was indeed true. Instead, large parts of his epistles’ Biblical quotations (notably those in the Epistle to the Romans) were taken from the Old Testament – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Hosea. His epistles were, indeed a product of tedious efforts, but that does not make Paul far better than any of the other men who authored the Bible, nor does it make him a Prophet.

Is Christmas a Pagan belief?
The Christian practices that were adopted under Paul included the following: the Roman sun-day as the Christian Sabbath; the traditional birthday of the Sun-god as the birthday of Jesus; the emblem of the sun-god (the cross of light) to be the emblem of Christians; and, the incorporation of all the ceremonies which were performed at the Sun-god’s birthday celebrations. Some of the days of the week are called after Norse Gods.
Sunday – Sun Day (sun god), Monday – Moon Day (moon god), Wednesday - Wodin (or Odin),
Thursday – Thor, Friday - Friea

Gospel of Barnabas
If Barnabas is disciple of Jesus pbuh, why not you incorporate his gospel in next version of bible?
Why not you incorporate gospel of Barnabas in bible? We Muslims believe that gospel of Barnabas is free from interpolation and mischief. O Christians, is there no place of pure gospel in your bible???