If the fire is raging, why not just set a couple of hoses shooting rooster tails between the houses to protect them and let the house burn to ashes so the cleanup is easier?
2007-07-25 15:12:05 · 7 answers · asked by jake45211 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
That is sometimes the case. It is a professional decision one way or the other.
2007-07-29 10:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? Is every house supposed to be completely demolished and removed after a fire? Much of a building's structure can remain perfectly sound if the fire is stopped early enough.
2007-07-26 01:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The house is screwed, but alot of family heirlooms and keepsakes can be saved. So since we got the hoses going, why not?
2007-07-25 22:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by California Street Cop 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You sound like the all volunteer fire department we use to have in a small town I lived in. We used to boast that they never lost a foundation.
2007-07-25 22:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And contribute to global warming with fire? Sounds like you hate the planet.
2007-07-25 23:07:20 · answer #5 · answered by Smartassus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In some cases, this is exactly what they do...save the neighbors.
Would this be your reaction if it was YOUR house?
2007-07-26 11:13:45 · answer #6 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should ask your insurance company that question.
2007-07-25 22:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by hdean45 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋