Let's just say this.....I wouldn't be flying in the next six or seven months if I were you.
2007-07-25 15:12:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
"No other method just planes"
What news are you reading? The planned attacks at Fort Dix were to be on the ground, the terrorist doctors in Britain used cars, and before that trains were attacked. In Iraq it is often car bombs, and I could give you a million other examples. Terrorists will use any tactic they can, including but not limited to airplanes.
http://wits.nctc.gov/AdvancedSearch.do
2007-07-25 22:08:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chance20_m 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
When you think of what a huge cruse missile a modern commercial aircraft is it does not seem odd at all. Given men who are willing to die it is the most effect weapon you can steal.
2007-07-25 21:59:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by oldhippypaul 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No where to run. A captive audience. Large number of casualty's. If you can destroy confidence in flying as a means of transportation, you've financially crippled your target. It takes one hell of a long time to drive from New York to LA.
2007-07-25 22:10:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Airplanes are an easy way to get away. You can't get stopped until an F-16 gets next to you.
They can cause mass death, etc.
2007-07-25 22:47:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mary A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the plane gets hijacked it's the cheapest cruise missile one can find.
2007-07-25 21:59:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by desertviking_00 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
they only resistance on planes is citizens without weapons.
2007-07-25 22:03:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Trout, I respect you for fighting the cause against ZIONISTS. Yet I don't see the point in this question.
2007-07-25 21:57:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
No, not odd at all.
2007-07-25 21:56:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋