why shouldnt women be in combat?

Question

what are the top 10 reasons for which women should not fight in combat for the us?

Answer 1

Today we do not fight like ancient days of one big formation marching right against the enemy. Yea, we can't be infantryman busting down doors but we are just as much in this as the males are when we ride out on convoy as drivers or Truck Commanders with the chances of being hurt by IEDs or small arms fire and such. So we are in combat.... maybe not on paper but some of us soldiers feel the heat just like the gus.

Answer 2

I don't have 10 reasons, but I will say this. During any mission when we had an attachment (civil affairs, military intelligence, etc. etc.) and they were female the male soldiers tended to look after them more. That is extremely dangerous. While I can accept that females have the right to serve in combat, I would say that they should serve in all female units.

Think about it, you're a man and you see a man punch another man, how do you feel? If you know neither one, you might find it amusing, you might feel slight empathy, but I seriously doubt you would engage the assaulter (unless it was a preposterously stacked fight). Taking the same idea, if you are a man and you see a man strike a woman, for most of us instant rage would fill and many of us would hit the man hitting the woman. There in lies the danger. Allegiance because of sex while outdated and having no place in modern society...is still a factor. Many lives could be lost because of this.

Answer 3

There are NO reasons why a woman cannot be placed in a combat situation like their male counterparts. Prior to recent 'adjustments' in 'combat deployments', women were generally kept out of combat due to a misguided sense of chivalry that preexisted within the Armed Forces. Women (and yes, other women in the military can 'thank' them) actually complained that the treatment that excluded them from combat was unjust and felt that they should be able to 'fight alongside' the men. Go figure, huh? I, as a guy, would have loved the opportunity to be stationed 'stateside' during Desert Storm, Somalia, and Bosnia, but since I was male combatant...that was not feasible at any time.

Answer 4

There is no professional reason why a woman cannot serve in front line combat PROVIDED she is able to satisfactorily meet all physical, psychological etc requirements of any other combat soldier.

Her physical tests should not be made easier..if there is a minimum standard then she should meet it, if not, she does not serve, like any other soldier.

I am reluctant to say a woman shouldn't serve in combat roles; but I can't stop to think about how much more emotional women can be, how she is to manage her menstrual cycle and issues with working in a team of men. Aside from that, I don't think the Joe Average public want to see women in this role.

Answer 5

that's a complicated question, although finally, i would not get too wrapped up it. i'm guessing you at present thought with regard to the armed forces and found out you may pass into infantry and likewise you incredibly would desire to confirm front line combat. that's wonderful to understand in this wartime interior reach climate, how we are combating would not have the front lines like it did in international war II. the place women individuals can't be infantry, they are able to be distinctive help positions which may be spoke of as in and notice some wrestle. consult with a recruiter, which you would be able to however get carry of what you like in a precise way, although no longer right this moment an 11B or 11C. there are particular issues of branches, like in all probability the marines won't be a fabulous selection when you consider that they nevertheless do no longer want a entire lot of roles for women. the armed forces is noticeably wonderful and that i think of the army an Air stress are the outstanding. in simple terms test your suggestions and talk to a recruiter.

Answer 6

I'm not goin to answer this question because we all know it wont change in this lifetime. People as a whole are still too closed minded to change.
but i will comment on what that girl laurren or what ever her name was. females now have the option to change their birth control so they don't bleed for months at a time. And any woman can use a damn baby wipe bath just like any man. Females like you are one of the main reasons why we will never make it into "combat." Not all of us are lil prisses that need to be primmed and trimmed everyday to maintain our self. not all of us are complete whores that think of having sex everyday with any man we can get.
There are so many females in uniform, that given the chance, my bet would be, to outshine a few of the good ole boys.
I'm not talking a GI Jane, or any of that nonsense. Just another soldier that you would be happy to have at your side when your *** is on the line. Not male, not female, just a United States Solider.
But than what do i know, I'm just a female. I shouldn't have such notions should I?

Answer 7

West point and the other academies used to have much higher physical standards to pass-A level which they thought necessary for the soldier to best stay alive. Now not only is there a large double standard for women-but the men have it easier too due to obstacle courses being change to accommodate women(removal of upper body exercises). Women just aren't as strong-sorry. On average women have 55% of the upper body strength and 80% of the lower body strength of men of equal size and weight. And even the strongest women top 2% are usually only a match for weaker or mediocre men. "Men are not big women, women are not little men". Some of you have said that if they can pass the test let them in-Tried it, so few make it that it’s not cost effective to accommodate women.

Enemy troops do not surrender to women-shown from experience.

The only other country who experiences significant combat that tried to use women failed miserably(Israel).

Men’s protective instinct toward women puts them in further danger-not gonna change

Think for just one hole second-why has every war in history been fought by young men? Because they are the best suited to do the job(Granted 19 year old men are no match for 26 year old men but its easier to recruit the younger ones). It would be cowardly to ask older men or women to fight when you have a much better chance at survival and victory. If we are gonna use women why not use older men? Think girls who would be better at pulling a man off the battle field you or your 40 or 50 something dad? Be honest with yourself.

Take a group of men and a group of women fully train them both to meet west point standards give them paint rounds, drop them in the forest and see who wins. If you had to bet $1000 who would you bet on.

Answer 8

On a battle field, if it was an all women division with no men in sight, it would be fine..However, by our very nature, as men we would risk our own lives to protect any women on the front line (no matter her personal skill and abilities) and there by put ourselves in harms way. Furthermore, there is a lot more that can be done to a women (and often is) when she is captured vs. a man. Women, no matter how heartless they appear to be, allow their emotions to lead them-men do not. A woman would, more than likely, hesitate to shoot a child they may be caring a bomb, and their by put herself and others in harms way-a man would not think twice about it, until after the act was committed.

Answer 9

Well first off women are not use to actual combat. But, male soldiers such as marine recon or army rangers can spend up to a month out in in Field with no showers, a women who has her period and unable to shower is unhealthy. Please men are going to defend women if they are caught on enemy lines. Women make great soldiers just not in combat.

Answer 10

The enemy is more likely to first try to "take out" whomever is different in the group. A sniper could shoot a woman and it is the natural male reaction to rush to help, placing their selves in the line of fire before it is safe to do so. Instead of first blocking the line of fire by a armored vehicle etc, it could result in a shooting gallery.