are just dumped somewhere in the desert?
I guess the satellites do not monitor every single garbage truck heading into the desert to dump the waste.
Obviously Saddam stated he had got them and obviously he had used them at least twice.
The chemical WMD usually do not just vaporise without any residua.
2007-07-14 02:52:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
cutsie, the Scud is launcher not the WMD scud maz carry the konventional or WMD warhead.
I guess noone said iraq has NUKES. WMD are the chemical and biological weapons, too. Allies do not have enough soldiers to scout every single house for hand weapons, yet for digging through the wastedumping areas.
2007-07-14 03:22:33 · update #1
bombing air defence facilities usually does have no instant nor long term effects upon the civilian life, unless someone totally mad places AD post in the vicinity of the hospital.
2007-07-14 03:25:29 · update #2
RPG > nice but it is not an issue discussed in my question. read it.
2007-07-14 03:30:45 · update #3
There were chemical weapons found here in Iraq....all you have to do is a little research to find that out. I've seen some with my own eyes. Chances are that the chemical weapons that were inspected (some destroyed) after the 1991 Gulf War found thier way to Syria....intelligence photos leading up to OIF support this theory....
So, cutsie dread, the mustard rounds and 55 gallon drums of nerve agent we found over here are a figment of my imagination, huh?
RIIIIIIIIIIIGHTTT!!!!!!
2007-07-14 02:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by gregpasq 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Some chemical weapons were found and small caches of various types and strengths of bombs and firepower were discovered. No nuclear weapons were found and there was not nearly the store of weapons that was claimed by the administration when they were seeking the authority to invade Iraq. A lot of Saddam's warnings of weapons stored and ready was bravado on his part. The truth is that Iraq was a quite weak and steadily deteriorating nation due primarily to the nearly constant bombing campaigns of the US and Great Brittain.
2007-07-14 10:07:23 · answer #2 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Look, face it, you'll have to someday!
There are NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (except for the ones the troops took there). Saddam said a lot of dumb things and when did he ever use any WMDs? The few Scuds he lobbed at Israel were not much to worry about - most of them were duds and could hardly be called WMDs. Surely if there were anything remotely resembling a WMD anywhere in Iraq wouldn't you have thought they would have found it, dug it up and paraded it out a long time ago.That would justify everything that is happening in Iraq.
They are simply not there. Accept it.
2007-07-14 10:07:08 · answer #3 · answered by cutsie_dread 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
the weapons were used against his own people the Kurds so they did exist, now where were they when we searched months later, they were moved to Syria, no questions about that, now cutsie if you knew that your house was to be searched 6 months from now for drugs or illegal immigrants, you would make damn sure there were none there when it was time to search, so what makes you think it is any different searching a country.
2007-07-14 10:48:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Most likely they were taken to one of the storage facilities at Al Safir.
2007-07-14 10:05:20 · answer #5 · answered by Noah Tall 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I know a true location of WMD!!!!!
North Korea!
2007-07-14 10:27:08 · answer #6 · answered by RPG-7 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are there somewhere. I suspect Syria.
2007-07-14 09:57:50 · answer #7 · answered by John himself 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋