English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-12 03:42:04 · 20 answers · asked by x_manda_cx 1 in Food & Drink Vegetarian & Vegan

20 answers

boiled and raw seem mutually exclusive... just as a seafood and chicken eating vegetarian would also seem mutually exclusive..

2007-07-12 03:48:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dave C 7 · 2 0

1. This question makes no sense...if it's boiled..it's not raw
2. Vegetarians do not eat ham

2007-07-12 11:05:27 · answer #2 · answered by KathyS 7 · 0 0

Well it certainly wasn't ME. Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww meat Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

2007-07-15 22:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by MissVegan2007 1 · 0 0

Extremely bizarre question. However, this is the forum for bizarre questions and even more bizarre answers. V&V is the forum of choice for the "crazies"

2007-07-15 07:24:35 · answer #4 · answered by Skully 4 · 1 0

That really doesn't sound very appealing is that a mechanically modified meat? thank goodness vegetarians and vegans don't have to worry about that

2007-07-12 12:26:39 · answer #5 · answered by kate m 3 · 0 0

A contradiction in terms

2007-07-14 13:23:10 · answer #6 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0 0

I know, I saw Robert with no name on the colorless black horse, grab it and then took off, eating it on the run.

2007-07-12 12:14:19 · answer #7 · answered by DrPepper 6 · 1 0

hello!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the 2 adjectives you have used cannot possibly apply to the same piece of ham

2007-07-16 09:03:00 · answer #8 · answered by suzi b 2 · 0 0

if its boiled it cant be raw so no one did xx

2007-07-12 10:45:44 · answer #9 · answered by nendlin 6 · 5 0

If it's boiled, it's not raw.

How long was it boiled?

I don't understand your question. :-(

2007-07-13 22:30:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers