boiled and raw seem mutually exclusive... just as a seafood and chicken eating vegetarian would also seem mutually exclusive..
2007-07-12 03:48:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dave C 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
1. This question makes no sense...if it's boiled..it's not raw
2. Vegetarians do not eat ham
2007-07-12 11:05:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by KathyS 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well it certainly wasn't ME. Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww meat Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
2007-07-15 22:37:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by MissVegan2007 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Extremely bizarre question. However, this is the forum for bizarre questions and even more bizarre answers. V&V is the forum of choice for the "crazies"
2007-07-15 07:24:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Skully 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That really doesn't sound very appealing is that a mechanically modified meat? thank goodness vegetarians and vegans don't have to worry about that
2007-07-12 12:26:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by kate m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A contradiction in terms
2007-07-14 13:23:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scouse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know, I saw Robert with no name on the colorless black horse, grab it and then took off, eating it on the run.
2007-07-12 12:14:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by DrPepper 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
hello!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the 2 adjectives you have used cannot possibly apply to the same piece of ham
2007-07-16 09:03:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by suzi b 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if its boiled it cant be raw so no one did xx
2007-07-12 10:45:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by nendlin 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
If it's boiled, it's not raw.
How long was it boiled?
I don't understand your question. :-(
2007-07-13 22:30:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋