Yes, 4 fans use less power than the A/C. A fan uses about 100 watts or less. The A/C uses 1,000 watts or more. My central A/C uses 5,000 watts! But do not run the fans in an empty room. Fans do not cool the air. A thermometer in a room will not go down even one degree when the fan is on. Fans only help the human body to cool itself better by enhancing evaporation from the skin. If you cannot feel the breeze from the fan, it isn't doing any good at all. A fan running at any speed in a room with no people in it is just a waste of electricity. Last person out of the room turns the fan off and the first one back in the room can turn it on.
2007-07-09 16:59:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
13⤊
2⤋
Well, you didn't tell us what kinds of fans and everyone seems to be assuming they're small ones. You can probably use a combination of the two to keep things comfortable, conserve energy and mitigate environmental impacts. Use the A/C to bring the temp down, then turn it off and use the fans to keep the cool air distributed evenly. But also keep the curtains or blinds drawn on the sunny side of the house to keep the inside air from heating up again.
But to be safe, check your fans and air conditioner with the ratings offered by Consumer Reports or another consumer group. And consider this advise from the Consumer Reports site:
"And before you put on a cotton sweater to ward off a slight chill from the AC in summer, consider that for every degree you raise the thermostat setting, you can expect to cut your cooling costs by at least 3 percent."
2007-07-09 19:31:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Check the wattage of each appliance and compare. Note, though, that an air-conditioner compressor cycles on and off, and rarely runs 100% of the time. For a true comparison use a watt-hour meter (~$30-$50) that integrates power and time.
My off-the-cuff guesstimate:
Each fan uses ~80 W and runs perhaps 12 hr/day, for ~90 kW/hr per month.
A 5,000 BTU (~5 megajoule) (a small room air conditioner), EER of 10, might use 700 W with compressor on, 100 W with just fan. If it averages 50% duty cycle (~400 W avg.) and is on 12 hr/day, then it would run ~150 kW/hr per month.
BTW, I sometimes use one room air conditioner to cool the whole house, but need to run a fan or two between rooms. Using a small air conditioner lowers humidity more effectively than using an oversize unit, which is more important in the the climate in which I live.
2007-07-09 16:05:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
There are some stable solutions published right here. enable me upload that in case you have air con (can no longer think of a house in Texas devoid of it), you ought to verify into the fee of upgrading your air con equipment from a uncomplicated thirteen SEER to a some distance better score. There are financial tradeoffs, yet I replaced a thirteen-12 months previous 10 SEER air conditioner and went to an 18 SEER Trane unit with variable fan speeds. It has cut back my application expenses by extra desirable than 50% interior the summertime warmth in Arizona plus made the domicile extra comfortable because of the fact the variable fan we could me run the air recirculation placing. This has oftentimes eradicated warm spots interior the domicile as some rooms were getting warmer than others using domicile windows, severe ceilings etc. I went somewhat overboard according to hazard (a SEER sixteen unit might have stored almost as a lot), yet i grow to be looking no longer in easy terms to cut back my direct expenses yet additionally to cut back my own electricity intake so as to lowering international warming. Ceiling followers are actual super to have. they are inexpensive in boost and it particularly is amazing to get variable velocity fan controls geared up in. one element which you would be waiting to do is develop attic ventilation until now the roof is performed. The builder may be waiting to grant you a roof ridge venting equipment that's a lot extra effective than commonplace attic venting -- it enables shop attic cooler hence lowering warmth flow on your place. it particularly is in basic terms too costly to characteristic after the reality, yet should not be terrinbly costly on the front end. verify together with your interior sight application employer approximately rebates. Many grant rebates for advancements, yet they could or won't prepare to new shape.
2016-12-10 07:18:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don`t really care... My province has one nuclear power station for street lightning, and the rest is hydropower!!!
But as far as you are concerned, A/C don't really used more power than fans! Since the thermal exchange is supply by a pump and a fan... So you end up using 2 engines in the same device. And you are using 3 fans... Which mean you use more energy than using only your A/C
2007-07-09 18:12:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jedi squirrels 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
Air conditioning uses an enormous amount of electricty, which results in most cases in large amounts of carbon and other pollutants being emitted into the air as the power is generated.
2007-07-09 15:57:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
6⤋
It's cheaper than the cost of a heat stroke.
2007-07-09 16:58:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
It'll cost you more money on your electrical bill, that's about it. It's not going to destroy the environment, that's a bunch of BS.
2007-07-09 15:45:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
15⤋