English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

NO, not at all!
Its the tribes in Iraq that all want to be in power, killing each other in order to gain control of the populations, they are the ones that are destroying the peace efforts being put forth by the new Iraqi Government, not the Americans.

The American troops, OUR troops are trying to establish peace between the waring tribes, and are getting caught right in the middle of all the inner fighting between these groups, and because of this, we are getting tired of this bullshit game, and are striking back at those that seek to do us harm.
We accomplished our intended mission of containing Saddam, destroying his military might, but those same people that Saddam had kept in check all these years are now wanting to seize power through fighting and brute force and awarkdness will never win, freedom of the people will win everytime. These insurgents can't seem to get their **** together, they are fighting everyone that stands in their way, they want to rule the country of Iraq, just like Saddam ruled, but they can't accomplish this goal because the people of Iraq have finally had a taste of real freedom and they want more. If the good people of Iraq don't support these individual factions movements, the movements will crumble.
And, from what I can see, they aren't supporting these splinter movements at all......Freedom will prevail!

2007-07-01 19:30:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Iraq has already disintegrated, due primarily to US military and political pressure, but also (shamefully) with more than a little help from our own Government.

One of hte primary aims for invading Iraq was to oust Saddam Hussein as leader. This did not require the systematic destruction of a country's infrastructure and the marginalisation of its peoples. Yet this is what happened.

The idea that Iraq was a terrorist state has now become a self-fulfilling prophesy, and this is exacerbating all authorised security forces in the country to reach a viable level of peaceful accord. Until the US stops trying ot maneouvre the political situation in Iraq to meet its own ends and agenda, the country will continue to become more marginalised and, yes, eventually disintegrate completely.

2007-07-02 06:11:00 · answer #2 · answered by Norman W 3 · 0 2

They have already entered a civil war, it will escalate until food and water supply is totally disconnected. It happens every where, as long as their belly is full people do not come on the roads. It happened in India when Indians were asking for independence, we have seen in Iran during the Shah's period and successfully overthrew him, we have seen in Yogoslavia, Poland, Romania and the worst we saw in Vietnam. No doubt at this time two sects are fighting each other, it is history, they have been fighting for centruries, it was a temporary truce with Sadaam's cruelty and now when he is no longer around, these people are freelancers.

Today, Australian Prime Minister openly declared we are there for oil, Bush today asked Americans to be more patient. What does it mean, it means the American public opposition against war is growing and getting momentum. US is under pressure, from Sunnis, Shias, American public and politicians equally, the world opinion above all as is alleged Iran and Syria posing hinderances. How long US can survive in this catch up? I am sure, not too long. The other side of the picture is, when US occupied they posed as Liberators which Iraqis believed and slowly they turned into Occupiers. Is it bad to fight for your country to get independence from a foreign ruler. Every one does the same, we did it in India, Afghanis did it for their country when Russians came, Banga Desh did it to get rid of Pakistani rulers. But remember, to get independence you have to give blood, which is what they are doing and ultimately they will get their independence and of course one day rule their own country; it could take half a centrury but surely they will achieve it. That is a different issue who rules them, they dont have experience of democracy, perhaps they will look for another Sadaam Hussain who could be their King or an Army General.

2007-07-05 11:59:09 · answer #3 · answered by Alf 4 · 0 0

Iraq is a false country created by the British after the fall of the Ottoman empire. The U.S. isn't the force behind the break down. Even Saddam had to use brute force and bribery to keep things in line. Iraq in it's natural state is really three countries and maybe two or three more city states.

2007-07-02 02:28:17 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

"will disintegrate"? You're putting it in future tense? Do you mean "will further disintegrate"? Well, some would say it has already disintegrated. It certainly isn't "integrated".
No comment as to "US pressure".

2007-07-02 02:30:59 · answer #5 · answered by MALIBU CANYON 4 · 0 1

The place kind of has already. The problem is that this is a war on faith and a concept. You can't desroy them. There is no way to win as the ideal of middle eastern culture will always live.

2007-07-02 02:19:24 · answer #6 · answered by Michael G 2 · 0 0

no, we are there trying to help, it is Syria, Alqaeda and Iran making a mess of it!

example:

story on Yahoo news:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070702/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

story is as follows (In case story expires in Yahoo):

"BAGHDAD - Iran is using the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah as a "proxy" to arm Shiite militants in Iraq and Tehran's Quds force had prior knowledge of a January attack in Karbala in which five Americans died, a U.S. general said Monday.

U.S. military spokesman Brig. Gen. Kevin J. Bergner said a senior Lebanese Hezbollah operative, Ali Mussa Dakdouk, was captured March 20 in southern Iraq. Bergner said Dakdouk served for 24 years in Hezbollah and was "working in Iraq as a surrogate for the Iranian Quds force."

The general also said that Dakdouk was a liaison between the Iranians and a breakaway Shiite group led by Qais al-Kazaali, a former spokesman for cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Bergner said al-Kazaali's group carried out the January attack against a provincial government building in Karbala and that the Iranians assisted in preparations."

the date is July 2, 2007.

rest my case.

2007-07-02 03:55:38 · answer #7 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 0 1

the only way that iraq will disintegrate when we pull our troops before the job gets finish

2007-07-02 02:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by mz 2 · 2 1

no, it will be another Vietnam. When there are enough troops killed there will be a public outcry and government will be forced to withdraw from Iraq. The lesson is never learned.

2007-07-03 16:50:03 · answer #9 · answered by danor 5 · 0 1

Not at all........when the USA move out Iran is waiting in the wings to take Iraq . There are no wimnners and no looses in this game......Islam is here to stay

2007-07-02 03:05:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers