Which law of science proves no life beyond death?

Question

if u cant give answer you have no right to say that there is no life beyond death because you are neither follower of science nor god.

Answer 1

It depends on how you define LIFE and DEATH.

With respect to human senses LIFE means perceiving action,movement,change.
DEATH is the absence of action,movement,change which our senses cannot perceive.

However there CAN be LIFE that is beyond human sensory perception.
But science ignores everything that is beyond human perception. Hence according to science, in the event of death there CANNOT be LIFE that we used to perceive with human senses.

Even after death (natural death) all the organs resposible for perception may be in good condition, means it can be used for some one else, but just it cannot be related to that physical body in which it has stopped functioning.

This particular nature of a living being typically does not match with what science says.

My understanding is if we relate LIFE as the life of our physical body than it ends with DEATH. But you cannot relate LIFE just with one physical body, it is everywhere in this universe.

Wherever there is action,movement,change there is LIFE.

Answer 2

There is no law of science that proves or disproves life beyond death. Nor shall their ever be. Science deals with the physical world, that which relies solely on the senses. The progression of life is in the spiritual world. It therefore can not be proved or disproved by physical test.
However, I must believe in life beyond death. There is although not physical evidence; their is personal evidence to support such a claim. Given that we can recognize people from our past lives as we meet them in this lifetime. And also in the fact that we are drawn to certain events and places. When placed with difficult choices; we can sometimes know from past experiences (from different lifetimes) which choices will and will not yield a favorable result. This personal evidence leads me know that the mind is imprinted on to spirit which is released during the last breath. The spirit most either than join the spirit of the Lord or be re-birthed to can further knowledge. The imprint from previous lives with meditation guides me through this life in hope of join with the Lord.

Answer 3

Wow, you are somewhat confused as to what science has and has not attempted.
I remember (years ago) scientists try to find evidence of the soul or spirit. When a patient died, on a set of extremely sensitive scales, they documented a slight drop in weight just seconds after death. I didn't have the science education back then that I have today, so I can't tell you if they calculated the mass of the volume of air in the lungs. This may or may not have matched the difference in weight.
What some people don't realize, is that not all people educated in the sciences are Atheists. My anthropology Professor was a Catholic, he teaches evolution on the basis of facts and evidence. This causes no inner turmoil for him, he loves his job & his church.
I'm sure you will get alot of flack over your choice of wording "life beyond death". Life is of the human form. We don't know either way as to whether or not the spirit exists in an energy form after the death of our human form.
I do believe that the spirit/soul exists after death, but I'm sure it's not in the same way that you believe.

Answer 4

Never has science proved that there is no life beyond death. In the contrary there were some incidents in the past which gave us an insight about life after death. one such incident was advocated by Mahatma Gandhi himself in the 1930s. During that time a young girl told about some facts about her past life in a village where she had never been to or heard of in the current. everything this 7 year old told was found to be true.

U can surely say that science is by itself a religion and a part of many other religions. It is nothing above God.

Answer 5

The very basic of so called modern science ( modern science itself has no scientific background , that is anyways a different story altogether ) opposes the existence of life beyond death.

The formation of life , through complex molecules etc and all that crap, and even they went to such an extent that the baby being born is a bio chemical process. what more you want. Modern science is meaningless,

SO CALLED MODERN SCIENCE IS FIT FOR ONLY THOSE WHO NEVER WANTS TO UNDERSTAND THE HIGHER NATURE THAT CONTROLS MATER AND MATERIAL MANIFESTATION. ELSE IT WOULD NOT HAVE BELIEVED THAT THE COSMOS IS A RANDOM TRAGEDY AND MANY MANY MANY MORE THINGS.


but it is painful that this has become a hindering process, by such false limitations, you are jailing you mind and creating unwanted limits on path of understanding , and limiting your knowledge, intelligence, and also understanding of this nature, which in turn is your own personal nature too. This applies to you , me and everyone. but at last this is the deliberate act of time, and should have happened in no other way.

-- deito

Answer 6

Luckily there is no law that proves it doesn't but there is no law that proves there does. But so many people believe that there is life after death and people may "die" for a short ammount of time and then come back. If you were to die as all these scientists are saying how would you come back? Your soul I suppose? Therefore there is a high chance that there is life after death.

Answer 7

There is no law of science thsat says life does not go on!
As a matter of fact,some scientists say we do indeed go on through the electrical impulses that escape from our bodies at death.
All these scientists that say near death experience is just a bunch of neurons firing off in a dying brain,I have one question!
Why would a person see a place or person they had never thought about or known?Our brains would have to have the info in the first place to form the picture!

Answer 8

I tell you that if cant prove that THERE is life after death you have no right to ask this question. You are not a follower of science and certainly you are not god.

Answer 9

Isn't it amazing that although no one can prove that there is life after death, those who believe that there is are ridiculed by those who cannot prove that there isn't. There is no scientific proof of either, but what is noteworthy is that those who do not believe in an afterlife are usually those who consider themselves the "humanitarians", the "tolerant", the defenders of your right to free speech, the ones who advocate a womans right to choose, yet gnash their teeth in protest if someone kills a rat. For them, the prospect of an afterlife would be bleak indeed.

Answer 10

Last I checked no law of science has proven this, but science has validated the Bible many times, science actually was inspired by the Bible, yet sadly many scientists have used science against the Bible.

Creation is more scientifically provable than Evolution, even an Atheist proved Creation (of coruse after that he created the theory that the aliens created us, due to not wanting to admit there is a God).