evolutionists: About the Fossil Record i just destroyed your theory? End of story? 10 points if proven wrong?

Question

The Fossil Record proves their WAS A CREATOR! There was a Flood and a lot of animals died and they all got buried under the mud created by the Flood! That's why there are fossils in the ground!!

Answer 1

Notice how many answers are intended to ridicule the questioner (big surprise).

I'm waiting for a substantial reasonable response.

Not saying I agree or disagree, but welcome the debate.

Debate...not the usual tactics of insult and ridicule.

Answer 2

You don't even understand the simplest concepts of geology or biology. A flood is not needed to deposit creatures in the ground. I feel sorry for you....that is...your lack of education.

Look at it from this prospective in the book of genesis it states the earth was made something like 3 days before the sun. If this is the case, how were they able to tell 3 days had passed before the sun was created??? There was no sunset to distinguish the days, the clock wasn't invented, and a sun dial would have been useless considering the sun wasn't created yet.

There's your contradiction. I'm not even religious but at least to some extent I understand of the other side of the coin. You put forth nothing to support your claim

Answer 3

And how did they get sorted by level of development?

If it was all flooded at once, then everything would be jumbled together. Human bones would appear thought the fossil record. As would all other modern animals.

But the lowest fossils in the strata are all very simple creatures. As we go up the strata the creatures get more complex, but there are no land animals, higher still we get plants and insects, but no reptiles, mammals or amphibians. Higher still amphibians appear, then reptiles then mammals, but no birds. We do not see birds until we are above the layers the dinosaurs are in. We do not see current mammals and man until the very top layers.

How nice for the flood waters to sort all these bones for us. How cleaver of them to also sort everything by radiological age too.

Or I could be being sarcastic, and you could be totally wrong.

10 points please.

Answer 4

regrettably your thought is incorrect on purely approximately all money owed. Vile Temptress is a social evolution not a actual evolution. The meme fossil evolution path is easy to maintain on without of your previous posts (which includes the consistent changing of your seen call). to boot social fossils fragments going lower back with the aid of biblical situations or perhaps in the past show that girls progressed into vile temptresses until eventually now written history. there have been occasional evolutionary forays into open reflects of Vile Temptry, yet those are many times short lived and not conductive to the ongoing of the female sub-species. in basic terms in cutting-component situations has a social ecosystem progressed that would help a inhabitants of brazenly Vile Temptresses (ie: Y!A, technology fiction conventions, Dutch dominatrix homes, etc)

Answer 5

Where is the rest of the evidence of a global flood? Modern geology shows that there is no evidence of such a flood.

Why aren't there more fossils? With a global flood, one would expect an abundance of fossils where there are so few.

You're giving V's name a bad reputation with that avatar I might add.

Answer 6

So how did they end up SORTED? It is called the Law of Fossil Succession and there is NO WAY a single random event could have sorted them, including the plants.

Nice chart: http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/fossils/succession.html
7 major cuts on the animal side and 6 on the plants. The full story is a lot more complex, but why are there no flowers in the layers from the Pennsylvania layers. Why no birds in the Jurassic?

Answer 7

Well go read the different flood myth's and you'll see that the story of Noah was inspired by ancient Babylonian flood myths.
Another thing is if the whole planet was flooded the air would contain so much water vapor that everyone on the ark would have drowned just trying to breathe air.

Answer 8

Flood is not the only reason. It could be one of the cause. There is the law of the negation of the negation. Meaning, the old will die and replace with the new. By being old, all plants and animal will die. Not only living things but also non living things will also weather away.

Answer 9

Yawn, you're not even trying.

Fossil formation takes place on both land and sea, on land its usually in bogs or tar pits - which provides the ideal conditions, anaerobic, no oxygen meaning no bacteria and no decay. Hence the dead animals fossilise and undergo sedimentation. In the sea, carbonate sedimentation occurs, preserving shells of sea creatures in limestone.

Not all fossils are even found in preserved mud based stones, in fact the best conditions for fossilisation are water free and dry - everything that discourages decay.

Why am I even bothering - you don't even have creditable sources for your crap ideas.

Answer 10

Look, all I will say is:

I believe in God. I believe he helped nudge creation along. I believe he nudged EVOLUTION along, he watched over this pathetic little planet, and since there is scientific proof of a flood (whoodido, have you tried paying attention to the problems with today's world?) you finally did something smart and agreed with the scientific community. :)

Answer 11

All must bow before such searing and circular logic. You and your type is why I tell my colleges that the greatest threat to evolutionary theory comes from the post-modern left; not the fundie idiots.