English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/utos-173.html

1. upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

2007-07-01 00:45:09 · 8 answers · asked by Dreaming Free's Alter Ego 1 in Politics & Government Immigration

8 answers

People are loosing their accounts so fast I can't keep up, were not really allowed to express an opinion because SOMEONE is bound to be offended especially on a topic such as immigration and you tell me how in the world do you NOT discuss ethnicity in the immigration section, society and culture, politics and government section, even the family and relationships section covers ethnicity.......

People need to be free to express a sensible opinion without fear of having their account zapped. I think maybe it might be because the immigration section really heated up over the last couple of months and maybe Yahoo is trigger happy.

I am not a fan of the name calling but those expressing their honest opinion should most definitely be allowed to answer without fear of account deletion. Political correctness has run amok.

By the way they want it overly broad to cover their behinds...

2007-07-01 02:46:05 · answer #1 · answered by Rabid Frog 4 · 2 1

Looks like BILLARYs` first by-law of her interpretation of The Fairness Doctrine to me ?? Except the last words` would say " objectionable to me being Queen of America & then the World" !!

2007-07-01 13:43:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It looks like a lot of posters on Yahoo break the rules, doesn't it? How do we know what is unlawful?

2007-07-01 08:16:54 · answer #3 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 3 0

Yup. I like the otherwise objectionable part, that could include everyone.

2007-07-01 08:06:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Sounds like an excuse to censor, I,m impressed you did translate that from Chinese Yahoo Answers ,Right.

2007-07-01 11:03:24 · answer #5 · answered by Dr Doom 4 · 1 1

They want. don't count. I guess that leaves or is that otherwise objectionable.

2007-07-01 08:13:04 · answer #6 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 4 0

LOL This is just a pansy cop-out legalese version of "shutup if you aren't going say what we want you to say."

And even if you "appeal" they don't care. See for evidence:
http://messages.answers.yahoo.com/Answers/threadview?m=te&bn=SEA-ViolationsNotice&tid=8104&mid=-1&tof=-1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1#-1

2007-07-01 09:23:03 · answer #7 · answered by Yahoo is Stupid 3 · 2 1

Yes, I think Yahoo chops out most of the anti illegal immigrant stuff.

That's why there are so many of me!

2007-07-01 19:43:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers