English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I live in California and there is worry of a water shortage and we are being asked to be conservative on water consumption. Therefore, is it better for the water shortage and the environment to drink bottled water (to save on CA consumption) and recycle the bottles afterward or is it better to drink from the tap (and not conserve as much water) and bypass the need to even recycle all those bottles? My boyfriend and I argue about this all the time!

2007-06-22 19:16:46 · 14 answers · asked by jmbiada513 2 in Environment Conservation

14 answers

Tap water. Look; the amount of water we DRINK- is so insignificant next to all the OTHER uses we have for it, -there's NO WAY it justifies the pollution we're making by bottling it !!! It's a joke. And the quality of bottled water is a rip-off too; half of the brands are selling us THEIR version of "city water"! We've been sold a "bill of goods" -and the people are "swallowing it"- hook, line & sinker. This is one of the WORST examples of wasteful consumption- there is. And we can't throw away our money fast enough- to buy into it. :(

2007-06-22 19:36:39 · answer #1 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 5 0

We've been drinking tap water for many many years and all the sudden some french moron puts it into a bottle and starts a revolution.

Tap water is safe, if it wasn't then it wouldn't be there. Or they'll warn you not to drink it.

Personally I like bottled water for the cleaner taste. But tap water is safe, just need to get used to that chalky, egg smelling or whatever kind of stuff might be in the water.

Buying the bottled water means you bought plastic that was produced which took energy to make and will take energy when getting recycled.

If you're arguing that bottled water does or doesn't cost too much and money is tight, then you can save money by just using the tap water.

But even the tap water needs to be treated with chemicals, so it too is not the perfect system.

So, it's a double edge sword really.

Figure out the lesser of the evils and go with it.

Good luck.

2007-06-22 19:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

To whom it may concern,
Your best uption is hidden option "C": Rain water catchment. set up a cistern/watertank and catch the rainwater off the roof via gutter. You may be suprised by how much rain water actually runs off that roof. Feel empowered by your own free/clean water supply.

Recycling plastic is a hoax. The amount of chemicals that are used to recycle plastic do not out-weigh the finished product. Also, most "recycled" products can more appropriatley be called down-cycled products because eventually it will end up in the dump.(don't be discouraged there are companies out there planning for the birth and redistribution of there products. If this interests you go to www.mcdonogh.com.)
If you decide to go with tap water, I recommend a filter. Check with your local government or library to see what kind of contaminants are in your water supply. If the filter doesn't treat chlorine let the water sit out so the chlorine can evaporate. I forget for how long but you can check it out in the book "The post petroleum survival guide and cookbook."
Regards, Ryan

2007-06-23 04:53:07 · answer #3 · answered by Unclebarr 1 · 0 0

Tap water. You have to think of the entire environment as a whole. There will be less land fill from the discarded container and better air quality. The transportation uses gas which pollutes our air. Another consideration is the loss of ground water needed by our aquafirs. Degraded stream habitat threatens trout populations. ... In Michigan and Northern California 'Save the Au Sable" and "Save the McCloud" are battle cries of those who care about our treasures.

2007-06-23 04:09:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Tap. Most of our bottle water is from the state. It would not help to conserve water by drinking water from other parts of our state. Those who are trucked in from other states or countries, waste gas as well as cost more to bottle. I think the one that waste the most is the ones made from filtered tap water like desante. Reverse osmosis waste alot of water to make the water more pure.

2007-06-22 21:16:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Plus the plasticizers in those bottles are carcinogens once they leach out.

Ironic, California sits alongside the largest body of water on the planet and yet they have to conserve drinking water because they can't bring themselves to look at nuclear plants sitting next to desalinization plants that would solve the problem.

2007-06-23 01:04:30 · answer #6 · answered by The Father of All Neocons 4 · 1 0

tap is bottle water come from the tap to start with take short showers don't leave the water running when you brush your teeth will save more water then you can by drinking bottle water

2007-06-23 01:35:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Unless you know the quality of water coming out of your tap I would drink bottled. It is better to be safe than sorry.

2007-06-22 19:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by oldhag 5 · 0 0

faucet water faucet water is examined on a daily basis. under the risk-free ingesting Water Act, water providers are required to furnish an annual checklist on the standard of your interior of reach water and to attempt faucet water on a daily basis. with the aid of assessment, the FDA examines bottled water basically WEEKLY, and clientele can’t get the corporate’s effects. faucet water is a good purchase. Bottled water expenses approximately 500 situations greater effective than faucet. in case you’re into relatively fancy labels, as much as a million,000 situations greater. faucet water is a teeth saver. It has greater fluoride than bottled water, which helps ward off teeth decay. You not at all outgrow your desire for fluoride. 4. faucet water is as a rule tasty. some places (long island city for one) have scrumptious water, yet once you don’t love the flavour of yours, the answer is easy ... run your faucet water with the aid of a Brita or Pur clear out, to get rid of maximum tastes and odours. the common abode clear out is going for $8.ninety 9 and produces the equivalent of three hundred great (sixteen.9 ounce) bottles of water. That’s approximately $0.03 cents a bottle, as against the $a million.25 or so which you’d pay in a marketplace. IMO .. bottled water is wasteful, and fully pointless. :)

2016-10-03 00:07:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

all tap water these days is suspicious unless it come from a spring or high up in the mountains

Purification does not even take all the effects of agricultural chemicals out of the normal bottled water whci changes the PH

That is why in Mexico so many kids are born infertile , gay or deformed

2007-06-23 06:01:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers