Why do we have nothing written about Jesus, during his actual life?

Question

So many other thinkers and disturbers of the peace had plenty written about them, during their lifetime...Spartacus, for example? Socrates?
Why is there a big zero about Jesus? Did nobody think ressurecting people and turning water into wine was an event worth writing down? Why didnt Jesus find the time to write anything himself, as every other philosopher of the day would? Why is it the oldest known records of the life of Jeus were written many years after his death?

Answer 1

Well, I can tell you, while studying THREE HUNDRED YEARS of Ptolemaic history, I had every single known reference to Jews... in one book. And most of them were teeny scraps like, "And Solomon son of Alexander, 20 minas..." and that was it. Just bare mentions.

If you study history, you'll see - and get so frustrated! - that sometimes there just AREN'T sources. Or, there undoubtedly were, but try preserving papyrus. Yikes. You need pretty seriously special conditions.

Jesus' aim wasn't really writing, you know - he was a mystic! And so were his apostles, until they (those few who survived!) started working on long-distance "fishing", and they needed to reach a larger audience than they could, preaching on their own.

BTW, Paul's epistles are less than 30s years after Jesus died... Paul's stuff is a primary source; he saw it first-hand. That's really pretty good, historically speaking - try studying Mohammed! Or the Buddha! Or soooo many medieval histories, written centuries after the fact - it's all a mess, trying to figure out which one is a first-hand account, and which parts are BASED on first-hand accounts, and which aren't at all... and sometimes you just can't know. Ahhh - I feel like that's half of the study of history.

So really, I don't feel like Jesus did so bad! Dude, his apostles even agree on what he did/said, even when they were writing hundreds of miles apart. You can do a LOT worse for sources than Jesus.

Answer 2

We may not have a lot written during his actual lifetime, however we do have a lot written about him by people who were with him and knew from firsthand experience what he said and did. There probably are many scripts out there that are either not yet found, or have been kept out of the scriptures because they mirror what is already included in our scriptures and it was left out by someone in authority in the church during the time when Christianity (religions) began to put together a one-book Bible. So, like a lot of things, we only get to read what the establishment says we are capable of understanding (basically, they think they are the smart ones and the rest of mankind is too stupid to decide some things for ourselves), like in the case of our forefathers including the electoral vote system in our new government declaration, because they thought most peasants were too stupid to actually vote in the "right" person by popular vote. I think it is probably the same concept and there are scriptures out there that are locked in some vatican museum or some other ancient museum display. Just my view, though.

Answer 3

There was something written about him durring his personal life.
There is a piece of wood that hung above his cross just ouside of Jerusalem.

It is called the Titulus Crucis. It rests in the Basilica di Santa Croce in Gerusalemmewhile, Italy. This is a piece of the sign that was nailed to the cross of Jesus.

Though carbon dating leads some scollars to believe this is a copy from a later time, I'm not sure that I would put too much merit in the carbon dating calculations. There could be many various reasons that its carbon dating shows it to be of late origin, But one thing is sure, it's lettering assure us that it is either an authentic relic, or at the very least an acurate copy of an authentic relic.

Answer 4

What was written about Jesus was written by men who actually lived with Him for a long time. Men like Mark, Mathew, James?
Then there was the man whom the Christ actually spoke to after God had raised Him from the dead. The Jewish Rabbi, Saul; now called Paul.
Then there is the man who was a doctor, a medical doctor who actually went out and talked to the Christ's mother, brother's, sister's and friends, "Luke". Luke, he did a great deal of detective work immediatly after the crucifixion of "Jesus of Nazareth", and his records still stand to this day.
The recordings of Luke are so detailed that to this day men of archeology use his book of Acts to search and find many a place that have gone to dust in time. But close scrutiny of his recordings have revealed a treasure trove of history that we cannot explain it away as oral tradition, passed on by one to another until some literate decided to write it down. Nor can we use the excuse that man made errors have slowly crept in over time, and copying the copies etc. The facts are too clean and strong. If the doctors statements are proved correct in historical archeology? Isn't it wise to assume his interviews with the people he talked to about Jesus are true as well?
We have plenty of things written down about Jesus and as for the Christ Himself studiously working in the secretarial aspect of His ministry would have been wastefull. He knew He had to die for the world and He knew that He only had a limited time to work in. Twelve Apostles were enough to record and report what happened during His tenure here on earth.
That is exactly what they did. Enough survived to produce the New Testament, many of the notes, letters, and statements of fact did not survive time, long enough for us to record some of the works of Simon? or Thomas? What we do have would have paralleled what the other Apostles taught.
There is no big zero about Jesus. Enough has been recorded about Him to transfix the world even two thousand years after His death and resurrection.

Answer 5

Because the Jews were from an oral culture. This is why Jesus spoke in parables. Parables are made so they are easy to remember throughout the generations. You may not remember if the parable includes a king and two servants or a king and three servants, but you remember the basic point that the king forgives both servants......... We're just lucky to have fragments of the gospel date to within 60 years of Christ. Some works of Josephus do not exist in manuscripts until 1000 years after his death anymore. Besides the Jews were used to religious leaders gaining followers and the leaders being killed. It happened a lot. Jesus was just one of those leaders whose followers persisted.

Answer 6

particular, he did, as a rely of certainty. a woman touched his gowns to get healing, and he did not rebuke her. He suggested "Your faith has made you properly." faith in what? of course her faith grow to be in HIM. yet over returned, he raised slightly woman from the ineffective while asked by utilizing her father to come again and heal her. while Timothy observed the risen Christ after the crucifixion, he suggested "My King and my GOD." Jesus did not rebuke Tim, yet suggested "Blessed are you...." extra, he all yet suggested "i'm God," while he claimed for himself the identify "i'm." "i'm the way, the certainty, the existence, i'm the resurrection and the existence...i'm the residing water... i'm the Alpha and Omega, initiating and the tip...in the previous Abraham grow to be, i'm." concerning the laying off of the blood -- you pick an expertise of the old testomony term, "covenant." It wasn't merely an contract or a settlement. in case you entered a covenant, you have been actually asserting "If I wreck this promise between us permit my blood be spilled." So no rely in case you thoroughly accept as true with it or are conscious of it, God entered right into a covenant along with his human beings, which THEY broke, yet God himself presented the thank you to fulfill the words of this covenant, interior the direction of the blood of Jesus, who grow to be the two completely human and fully divine. _____________________________ @philosopher: in case you relatively have been a philosopher, it fairly is advisable to study your timeline. Paul began writing approximately Jesus purely 20 or so years after Jesus' demise, and church homes have been already properly known by utilizing that element (in any different case there could have been no reason to jot down all those letters to the church homes in Galatia, Corinth, Ephesus, etc.). those manuscripts on my own irrefutably teach your remark to be fake.

Answer 7

He did the will of his father! His mother and brother wish to speak to him one day and he said to his disciples that you are my mother and brothers and sisters, the ones who do the will of God. He did not think of his mother and brother (James) as his true spiritual mother and brother. So it did not matter about his biography. He was there for a purpose.

Answer 8

because he wasnt a huge deal during his life time.

Answer 9

it takes time for a sorcerer to learn and do magick, ya know
he was a great illusionist too