I totally agree with you. If homosexuals want to have a child together, they should find some way to do it without anyone's help- just like everyone else! Oh wait, they think they're more special than everyone else. They will probably want some law to pass about this.
God didn't make a way for homosexuals to procreate, because God didn't intend for anyone to be homosexual.
*and you CAN choose who adopts your child, depending on which agency you use- such as Bethany Christian Services.
2007-06-21 06:32:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by mekelbee04 2
·
1⤊
15⤋
As usual, you are correct. The gays cannot have a baby by natural means, and they cannot legally marry in the eyes of God, and they should not ever bring children into such horrid sin. Kids need a mommy and a daddy, and I know that often that doesnt happen, because so much of it is from sin. PPL sleeping around, and all of that. If a couple does marry and cant ahve kids, they can adopt, but invitro is wrong, as they dispose of the unused enbroys, and that is sin. WE can only live obedience to Gods word and try to warn others and pray. But, we cant make them do it. But if they dont give it up, they will go to hell. Again, I am not judging. This is what God says and HE tells us Christians to warn all about all sin. So in obedience, thats what we do. YOu can hear those warnings, or ignore them. That surely is choice, but no homosexuals can truly marry, or have children, and its against God and the laws of nature. Encourage gays to get the help they need to find out what put them in this bondage of lust, and yes thats what it is, but some have changed, prooving with Gods help it can happen. If you had no choice over it, it wouldnt be sin. Heed Gods warnings before it is too late. we tell you becuase we love you and so does He, and He is so eager to forgive and give you a new life and a new heart where you too can obey. All we can do is tell you and if you want to hate us, we will get past it. As long as we are doing what God says, we are ok with God. This is someof our high calling to obedience and purity.
2007-06-21 12:37:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by full gospel shirley 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a conservative atheist who votes Republican lots of the time, i ought to care much less approximately gay marriage... Frankly, i do no longer basically like the fact that it relatively is even a communicate in politics on the national point. it relatively is a non secular count it relatively is a distraction and is unnecessarily divisive. If the government needs to meddle in marriage concerns, permit or no longer it rather is on the state point so the federal government would be freed-as much as get something functional completed. All this being pronounced, i'm able to grudgingly settle for the few faith-pushed rules of the Republicans, gay-marriage and abortion, earlier i'm able to even start to settle for the Democrats' platform that promotes own irresponsibility, government dependence, earnings redistribution, experimental social engineering, and is as a rule an attack on self sufficient persons.
2016-10-02 21:38:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love is the bottom line. God loved everyone, not just the people you think are deserving. Everyone will have the opportunity to come to God, so why would you exclude a gay couples adopted children? No sin is greater then another, so therefor the discrimination and hate that you are putting forth into the world makes you just a guilty (in a biblical sense.) God is the one who will judge, you don't have the authority or the right.
2007-06-21 06:54:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
So, are you telling me that if a hetero couple can't have a child, they should not be able to adopt, either? In this example, a hetero- and homosexual couple has the same problem - not able to naturally conceive a child. It IS discrimination if you want to treat the couples differently.
And your attitude disgusts me. Is that the 'christian love' I'm always hearing about?
2007-06-21 06:55:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mi Atheist Girl 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
In vitro, surrogacy, adoption (in the states where it's legal).
And no, I DON'T think sexual intercourse is so narrowly defined.
And no, not all same-sex couples expect other people to "make their babies".
By the way, you should pull your head out of the early 1970's and join the new millenium. Homosexuality isn't a disease and it isn't dangerous to children. Many many studies have demonstrated quite clearly that homosexuals are every bit as capable as heterosexuals at successfully raising healthy, well adjusted children.
2007-06-21 06:29:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
15⤊
2⤋
your a disgusting hate filled person. so your saying u would raher a child be raised in a orphanage then be raised by two loving parents who will give this child love, loyalty and everythign else they could possibly ever need. ur thinking makes no sense, u base things on their sexuality rather than what they can provide for children. stop spreading hate and be a better contribution to society.
2007-06-21 06:42:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by spadezgurl22 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Tell me again how you love the sinner and hate the sin. With a straight face.
The only thing that's keeping me from hoping people like you have a gay child someday, is the amount of suffering you would inflict on that child. It would teach you a lesson.
2007-06-21 06:35:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
2⤋
Why? All that matters is that a child has parents that love him/her. Why would their sexual orientation matter? I think homosexual couples provide an excellent solution to the amount of kids waiting to be adopted.
2007-06-21 06:31:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kharm 6
·
9⤊
3⤋
The state realizes what a bigoted jerk you are, and takes your children from you, and gives them to gays to raise. The rest of us do a happy dance, realizing that there will someday be balance in the world.
2007-06-21 06:46:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by mikalina 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
For female, sperm donor or adopt.
For male, a female willing to be an oven for the bun or adopt.
2007-06-21 06:37:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋