Title 26 is not law
The 16th Amendment was never legally or properly ratified by all states
Don't give me a link to tax evasion and more tax talk by the IRS or Federal information links
Show me the exact law - period
THE LAW ONLY
2007-06-21
06:08:39
·
5 answers
·
asked by
scottanthonydavis
4
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States
No real American would ever support the fake Federal Taxation non law and come on Answers to attack a citizen asking a real question.
Again you can't show the law. You just talk conspiracy crap like Elvis is alive and Moon landings.
No law, just more mumbo jumbo from a internet placed Federal answer monitor guy.
What branch of the Federal Government do you work for?
2007-06-21
06:21:25 ·
update #1
Show me where it says it is a law
Not more title 26 laws the are misrepresented by the Fed's and the people who are obviously happy to pay 40% of their labor earnings to a Government who steps all over our Constitution and starts illegal wars.
2007-06-21
06:23:38 ·
update #2
America - as you can see from the Federal responses below, they have no law and use intimidation and bogus title articles and amendment comments.
2007-06-21
06:35:31 ·
update #3
I will prove Federal Income Tax is not law
Google - Joe Bannister IRS
Why don't you learn something and quit babbling on about title 26
2007-06-21
08:33:47 ·
update #4
You will only hurt yourself. This has been going on for a long time, and nobody has won this in court yet. Get into reality, guy. You won't win a showdown and noone else will, either. They have the big guns, so obey the law.
2007-06-21 06:18:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scoots 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Damn! The Tax Kooks are out in force today. Probably one moron with 10 accounts, IMHO, but what the heck. Here it is, Sunshine: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.html
(Are they having a sale on "Clue Off" at Wal-Mart this week? These Yay-Hoos are out in force of late. LOL!)
You ARE correct in saying that the 16th Amendment wasn't ratified by ALL states. That is a true statement. It's not a meaningful statement, but it is a true statement. Unfortunately for your argument, it didn't have to be ratified by ALL states. Only 75% of the states had to ratify it. Since MORE than 75% DID properly ratify it, it was properly ratified in its entirety. Only 36 states needed to ratify it. 42 states DID ratify it. 4 rejected it and 2 never took action on it. So, how is it that you claim that at least 7 of the states that did ratify it did so improperly or incorrectly??
BTW, Title 26 of the US Code IS law. Your claim that it isn't is simply wrong, to put it in the simplest terms. It's just as much law a as Title 49 is, which covers transportation.
It's interesting that you keep all of your Q & A's here private and don't allow e-mail. Typical of an unknowing, clueless blow-hard! Get a life, Bozo!
C-Ya!
Addendum: Where do you get 40% from? You must be DAMN wealthy if you paid that much, friend, so quit complaining! I made a bit over $125k last year and paid just UNDER 23% total. That's FICA, Fed Income Tax and State Income Tax. If you paid 40%, I'll HAPPILY trade paychecks with you!
Addendum 2: Well, America, as you can see from the poster's incoherent ravings, we have our share of lunatics here. Are you a member of the Monster Raving Lunatic Party?
Addendum 3: Joe Bannister?? That moron is your "proof?" YGBSM!! What a laugh!! Have you ever actually READ his drivel? Did you note that it is FULL of disclcaimers? To keep his @$$ out of the sling with the government?? And did you know that he dutifully PAYS HIS TAXES in full and on time?! He's such a hollow SCAM ARTIST that many die-hard Tax Kooks SWEAR that he's an IRS plant! And you take ADVICE from this CLOWN?? Damn, you're gullible! I've got a bridge for sale, by the way, if you have an extra couple million in un-taxed $$$ lying around.
2007-06-21 13:19:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bostonian In MO 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Title 26 is part of the U.S. Code. If you don't think the U.S. Code is law, then you don't believe in a bunch of other things provided by the code. For example,
Title 7 covers agriculture. Without Title 7, there wouldn't be food inspections or limits on what types of insecticides are used. Basically, the food you eat wouldn't be as safe as it is.
Title 11 is bankruptcy law. Without it, nobody could file for bankruptcy protection. Don't fall behind on your bills or your creditors will just take it all. Since, according to you, Title 11 isn't law, you have no protection against that.
Title 17 is copyright law. Go ahead and publish some drivel about Income Taxes like Bill Benson. I'll let all publishers know that they can just copy your book at will. Since you don't believe U.S. Code is law, you won't mind that you never receive a penny for your "work".
Title 18 is crimes and criminal procedure. Since you don't believe that the U.S. Code is law, go ahead and rob a bank. You can argue to the court that Title 18 isn't law. Burn down a building on purpose, you can argue that Title 18 isn't law.
Title 20 covers Education. Since you obviously didn't receive any, I guess this doesn't apply to you either.
Title 23 covers highways. I guess you don't like those nice paved interstates either.
Title 29 covers labor. No minimum wage for you. Where do you work? I'd like to tell your boss they can pay you $0.10 a day and work you 16 hours a day, six days a week.
Title 39 is the postal service. You do like mail, don't you?
I could go on. Face it, Title 26 is part of the U.S. Code. The U.S. Code is law, therefore, Title 26 is law. There is no getting around that.
The 16th amendment was ratified. It wasn't ratified by all states, but then again, it didn't have to be. All arguments by Bill Benson and other tax kooks have been proven false in court time and time again.
Edit: You can believe Joe Banister all you want. Go ahead and not file tax returns or pay any taxes due. BTW, Joe Banister has admitted many times that he DOES file his tax returns and pays his taxes. He "helps" others file protest returns. So far, most of the people he's "helped" have ended up in court where their arguments are found to be specious and without merit and most often they end up in jail.
BTW, the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (the actual law and not the codified law), was passed by both houses of Congress as House Resolution 8300, and was signed by President Eisenhower on August 16, 1954, becoming Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3. (Page 3 of Volume 68A of the United States Statutes at Large) You can look it up for yourself at a Federal Depository Library. There have been many revisions over the years that have been enacted. Title 26 of the U.S. Code is a codification of the Internal Revenue Code as it is now. While Title 26 has never been "enacted" by Congress and is therefore technically not "positive law". It is, however, prima facie evidence of the law The Internal Revenue Code has been enacted and is "positive law". Since Title 26 is supposed to be a copy of the IRC, courts use it as such. If an argument is brought forth to the courts that Title 26 is in error, the courts will refer back to the US Statutes at Large for clarification. Now, if you don't understand that, take a freaking U.S. law course.
2007-06-21 13:48:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by NGC6205 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
THINGS I DIDN'T KNOW UNTIL I SAW THEM ON THE INTERNET:
Nobody ever really landed on the moon - it was a giant hoax. What you saw on TV was filmed in Utah.
Elvis is still alive, and performing marriage ceremonies in Las Vegas.
It is unconstitutional for the government to tax your wages (income tax), and most of what we think of as income isn't really income anyway.
Excuse me now....I just won 2 million pounds in the online UK lottery when my email was randomly selected, and I have to go answer the email.....
2007-06-21 13:14:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Judy 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Why don't you post your W-2's showing that you have never paid income tax along with your tax returns showing that any income tax that you paid was refunded to you on the basis of your claims?
2007-06-21 13:33:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steve 6
·
0⤊
0⤋