2007-06-21 06:02:14 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Holy Quran is competable
2007-06-21 06:33:19 · answer #1 · answered by chums12000 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
One does not know what book you have in mind, but you can never argue that it is holy! The so-called books are nothing but sheaves of paper, composed by unemployable and semi-literate people and they do not tell one anything scientific at all. The questioner seems to belong a persuasion whose book has caused so much hatred and violence and there is NOT ONE WORD in the "holy" books which provides a clue of scientific thinking. Every fundamental law of science is independently arrived at without ANY help from these wretched books which the questioner calls holy. In science we seek the nature of the universe, its composition, its origin and its final dissolution. Does the book which the questioner has in mind{whatever it is} contain answers to these ? No, is is the abswer! Ask yourself and you will discover that the so-called holy book is unscientific, irrational, illogical, dogmatic in assertions, and only strengthens the evil tribe of priests and they have no interest in the world of science. What has been said above is true of all scriptures{!}, but all the more so, of those which sprang from the middle east. After all they were all written before the age of rational enquiry.
2007-06-21 06:35:33 · answer #2 · answered by polymath 1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you have an open mind check out 'the Divine Principle' by Rev. Sun Myung Moon. Look at the chapter 'The Principles Of Creation'. All the chapters are logical but the first explains the fundamentals in a profound way.ISBN 0-910621-80-2.
2007-06-21 10:25:30 · answer #3 · answered by Meewah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No book, holy or otherwise, once it is published and its text fixed can remain compatible with science.
Science changes. What might seem cutting edge science today, will become discredited tomorrow. This is just the way science works. My guess is that one can date a book by the obsolete science it espouses.
2007-06-21 08:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Darrol P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Quran is not a book of science but contains proof of scientifical evidence and signs so for humans to contemplate upon, it talks about the cycle of water,the human embryo,vegetation,time and it's factors, human's themselves(mind,bodily functions, etc) read the Quran in whatever language you understand the best and see for yourself....
Islam is a complete way of life and contains solutions that deal with domestic to global issues.
2007-06-21 08:46:53 · answer #5 · answered by lucky 7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gulliver's Travels, by Jonathan Swift: it predicted the two moons of Mars 150 years before their discovery, and correctly predicted their orbital period.
This is a feat of scientific accuracy far more directly specific and uncanny than any of the vague science allegedly in the Quran.
2007-06-21 06:14:04 · answer #6 · answered by evolver 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mike M is correct. Science is always discovering truths that were already explained in the Bible. People put science and God in opposite directions. This is a mistake. God invented science. Scientist will continue to discover that the Bible was right all along.
2007-06-21 06:15:20 · answer #7 · answered by starfishltd 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not the Bible:
Virgin Birth 2000 years ago?
Man created from dirt?
Light before a light source?
Just a few examples of conflictions.
2007-06-21 07:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by thomasgilboy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm afraid non of them. Oh and for all those saying the bible, try reading your (consantly rewritten) editions of your ancient texts and compare them to the originals. You will slowly realise that they have no more basis in science than any other fairytale.
2007-06-21 06:22:57 · answer #9 · answered by Dragon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every item of alleged religious 'science' I've seen, or some situation in which the Bible supposedly anticipates a scientific discovery, has been utter nonsense so far.
CD
2007-06-21 06:11:08 · answer #10 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋