500 million yrs. it's old news ,....it was discovered 30 plus yrs ago in oklahoma. JUST curious if you are aware or just your thought in general. I will try to get the article posted soon, thanks...................
2007-06-21 02:38:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Its not true
2007-06-21 02:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
i saw that special on discovery and actually the dinosaur print is much older then the human print. the human print was left there many thousands of years after the dinosaur print. it had to do with something about the way the prints were fossilized gave the illusion that man walked with dinosaur. If it was true then i can't wait until the future because that means we have discovered time travel. cool.
2007-06-21 03:00:08 · answer #2 · answered by mystic 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What, like the old Far Side cartoon that shows the skeleton of a human crushed in the middle of a T-Rex footprint. One archeologist says to another, "I wish they would quit dying on top of my fossils like that".
Do post the article if you can find it. Otherwise expect a long list of critics stating that it is not true and insulting you. (After all, we all know that if you insult the messenger then his messenge is false). Usually best if you have the support available before making such a posting.
2007-06-21 02:44:52 · answer #3 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe the Bible is true - the earth is only 6000 yrs. old and God created man and dinosaurs on the same day. Genesis 1, 2 Just what the first dinosaurs looked like, I don't know. I believe all the dinosaurs, except two, were destroyed in a world flood 4000 yrs. ago. Of course the animals and eight humans saved in the ark reproduced and were together on the earth again!
2007-06-21 02:47:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There's no way it could be that old.
You need to be aware though that while there are many, many cover-ups in the scientific circles (who would admit they're wrong and lose a great paying job?) there have been a few instances where people fabricated things like this for a side-show type of thing for tourists to pay to see.
But yes, I wonder if this is real. I hope it is.
2007-06-21 02:45:15 · answer #5 · answered by Jed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That was fake. The human foot print was millions of years older than the dinosaur footprint. Nice try.
2007-06-21 02:45:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
...I've read that article and the young earth group tried to use that as proof of their religion through science, which was proven to be a fake. No need for the article.
Edit: To capitalctu
Piltdown man was proven to be a fake (by science), but they use piltdown man as an example of how science works, which also helps prove and disprove of what is fake and what is real for the future discoveries.
2007-06-21 02:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fred Flintstone must have been walking Dino. Did they find any dino-poop close by?
2007-06-21 02:42:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You really should get your science information from scientific journals, not Answers in Genesis (or some such group). One gives facts, the other lies.
2007-06-21 02:43:13 · answer #9 · answered by YY4Me 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That was NOT a human footprint and it has already been scientifically proven so many times that this isn't even a valid question anymore.
2007-06-21 02:42:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, this was a hoax that is still used (just like Piltdown man). But it goes to show you that carbon dating can't be all that reliable.
2007-06-21 02:43:42 · answer #11 · answered by capitalctu 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋