As far as my knowledge is concern bush attack on Afghanistan 2 catch osama.But he didnot success as a result a lot of ppl stand against him & he himself filled muslims heart with hatered dat many muslim join osama.
AGIAN
in iraq 4 catching sadam he attack on them & call dat country a weapons of mass destruction with no proof.
wat is ur opinion is it right 2 kill thousands of ppl 4 catching 1 person.
plz seriously answer
2007-06-21 01:27:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/revisewise/english/spelling/
good god...
you are trying to type in text and still have no ability to make an understandable sentence and it makes you come across as uneducated child, PO at the world. Just so you know, the US has been having issues with muslims and terrorists for a little longer than the last couple of years...
Is it worth it? it would have been worth the two or three nukes that could have solved the problem in a matter of minutes...
I see that in your ranting you neglected to mention Iraq and the invasion to supposedly get the US cheap oil. I still see $3.20 at the pump, so where is the cheap oil???
you people jump up and down and shout at the world 'UNFAIR!!!' or 'INVASION!!!', but when YOUR country needs help the US is the first phone call your government makes. My honest opinion??? close the US borders, get rid of ANYONE that does not have a visa to be here, and leave the world to rip its self apart. I for one am sick of having to police the world so morons like you can have a friggin soap box to stand and b i t c h on...
2007-06-21 01:45:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I was shocked by the decision to defy the United Nations and go ahead and attack Afghanistan but I don't agree that the solution to THAT is for Muslims to join bin Laden! What Muslims need is one good, intelligent, uncorrupted leader who will lead you to peace and condemn all warfare and killing. But that's never going to happen. And if America leaves the Middle East now ... even MORE innocent people will die like flies by the greedy and the power-drugged. What can you do?
2007-06-21 01:35:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends on the person.
If the person uses thousands of people as a shield to keep from being captured, then perhaps those thousands are killed.
I'm not in favor of the Iraq war, and I think that Bush botched catching Osama. However, I wouldn't generalize this as you have.
Also, in Iraq, it is mostly Iraqis killing other Iraqis right now over differences in their religious beliefs. I find this more tragic, that people would kill each other over trivial differences in a superstition.
2007-06-21 01:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by nondescript 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It serves a purpose.
It will show the Islamic World what they may face if they keep doing it.
Eventually Spanish, Danish, French, German, Swedish, Italians with get tired of having their trains blown up and maybe they'll take the same approach.
Remember Islam 1+ billion out of a 6 billion world.
Not good odds.
Don't provoke the majority.
2007-06-21 01:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is called the Bush Fallacy. Attack to deflect scrutiny that undermines your plans. Once Afghan was well underway and people said he was creating more terrorists. So he attacked Iraq (the enemy of al quaida)
You really should read Osama bin Laden's motives for 9/11.
I don't agree with them, but we really should understand our enemies mindset.
2007-06-21 01:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If it cuts off the money...yes.
The problem is the Middle East all supports it but is too cowardly to come out and say it. At some point you have to hold them accountable anyhow.
2007-06-21 01:41:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋