English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was thinking of buying some energy saver light bulbs but I realized they are about 8 times more expensive than normal ones. Does the energy they safe justify the price? I will only use them for a few hours a day.

2007-06-18 14:58:32 · 8 answers · asked by Riven 2 in Environment Green Living

8 answers

they actually do save a little on bulbs and in the long run you will save money because they run on less electricity and you don't have to replace them. But don't buy into the global warming effect.. they don't increase the amount of energy put out and do nothing to decrease global warming..

2007-06-18 15:01:21 · answer #1 · answered by aaron b 4 · 0 2

The average CF light bulb saves $88 in energy costs over the life of the bulb, and last 16 times longer than an equivalent standard bulb. Even if you only use them a few hours a day, the hours you use it total for the entire life of the bulb remains constant. It will just last you longer.

(ex. a bulbs life is expressed in hours. A bulb with a 24 hour life would last for one day if you ran it constantly, but 24 days if you only had it on for an hour a day.) So regardless of how much you use the new bulbs, they will still last longer, use less energy, and save you money.

2007-06-18 15:14:43 · answer #2 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 2 0

Using CFLs will lower your electric bill by about 7% each month because they only use 20-25% the energy of incandescents, which account for roughly 9% of the average electric bill.

Additionally, CFLs last 8-15 times longer than incandescents, so you make up that 8 times the price just by not having to replace your incadescents over that time period.

So basically using CFLs should save about 7-14% total on your electric bill when you account for the initial price, lifespan, and efficiency.

2007-06-18 15:31:41 · answer #3 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 0

I heard that one Energy Star CFL will save you $30 on electricity bill. They are not 8 times more expensive than regular ones, more like 2 or 3 times. If you think about it, they're actually less expensive because they save you a heck of a lot of $$.

2007-06-19 15:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by E-Kopps 5 · 1 0

They save quite a bit, about 78%. Even though they cost more, the electricity savings will more than make up for that cost before the bulb burns out.
Assume you replace a 60 watt bulb with a 13 watt CFL. That means you are saving 47 watts per bulb. Electricity is sold in units of kWh, or thousand Watt hours. 47 watts saved is 47 Watt hours, or 0.047 kWh saved for every hour you use the CFL instead of a regular incandecent bulb. My electric cost is 8.5 cents per kWh. So one CFL saves me 0.047*0.085 = $0.003995 per hour. That isn't much, is it? Less than a cent per hour. But it adds up. At 4 hours a day, that is 30*4=120 hours per month. That saves 120*0.003995=$0.48 per month. After 4 months it saves $1.92. You can get a 12 pack of CFLs at Walmart for $19.76, which is only $1.65 each. It more than pays you back in electricity savings after less than 4 months. After that, every month it lasts before burning out is 48 cents in the bank. It is like someone paying you 48 cents a month for every CFL you are using.

2007-06-18 15:45:01 · answer #5 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1 0

They use about a fourth of the energy and last several times longer than incandescent bulbs.

2007-06-18 18:26:30 · answer #6 · answered by Amy 4 · 0 0

cfl or esl which are newer and marginally safer than current cfl's.

2016-05-19 02:25:57 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

quiet a bit

2007-06-18 15:16:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers