Bestiality has nothing to do with homosexuality.
^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
2007-06-13 15:48:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Er... which Joseph are we discussing?
1) Genesis' Joseph's brothers were the real shepherds. Joseph was sold before he got the chance to do any real shepherding.
2) Mary's husband was a carpenter. Besides, he and Mary had loads of kids and he had a reputation of great honor.
3) The other Joseph was a pharisee. No sheep there.
Sorry, but I have NO idea what you mean. Besides, what do sheep have to do with homosexuality?
2007-06-13 22:50:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Studier Alpha 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you said boys, then maybe I'd agree. But if sheep was his thing, then maybe he'd be a friend of Catherine the Great. Anyhoo, nice job putting down gays saying that being gay is like wanting a sheep. Obviously either subject: bestiality or homosexuality seems to be comprehensible by you.
2007-06-13 22:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Was it a male sheep? I don't see how try to draw a connection between homosexuality and bestiality.
2007-06-13 22:53:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Back in Bible days, many households had sheep.
Maybe he was a Shepherd as well as a Carpenter.
2007-06-13 22:55:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I do not think he was! As for the sheep remark....is that a fetish or, desire for you? If so, to have sex with an animal is called beastiality...not homosexual!
2007-06-13 22:52:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
You seem to be implying that the average homosexual is into bestiality. To think that we Christians are always pegged as the homophobic and intolerant ones!
.
2007-06-13 22:54:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no just because he had sheep near him it didnt make him gay. and besides Joseph was straight.
2007-06-13 22:49:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You'd better put down the Holy Scripture and find another toy to play with before that lightning from heaven scalds your butt!
2007-06-15 18:20:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gay?
More like zoophilic...or some weird name for "sheep touchers"
2007-06-13 22:52:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That just shows ignorance. He had ED and there was no viagra then. He always carried a long staff as psychological compensation.
2007-06-13 22:49:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Chris F 2
·
0⤊
1⤋