GOD HOW MANY TIMES DO LIBERALS NEED TO HAVE THE SAME ANSWER TO THE SAME QUESTION UNTIL THEY FINALLY GET IT...bush has done nothing to be impeached for...use the clinton impeachment as a benchmark and you should understand the difference.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON.
2007-06-13 15:17:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have thought that one...and I support Bush in most other things...but there is a problem.
Pelosi is 3rd in line!
Oops...I thought you said impeach both. I am not sure Cheney would be 100% against it...depends on where the money comes from.
2007-06-13 22:06:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No need to impeach Bush for that reason. His so called amnesty plan will never go through anyway.
2007-06-13 22:10:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, but you let them Know you will vote for whoever, kills
this Three Headed Pig, they are trying to pass as a Reform Bill.
2007-06-13 22:06:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wish Cheney would run in '08.
2007-06-13 22:24:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Fritz 2
·
0⤊
1⤋