English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...is an indication that they know that they are caught in a lie, or should we give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they didn't know any better and were just going off of the lies told by corrupt scientists, and now that they are finding out, they are just shutting up about it??

2007-06-13 14:46:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Global Warming

9 answers

I was not aware of any silence on hte part of the left regarding Man Made Global Warming.

It is well established that Global Warming has two sources.
One of those sources is Global Warming due to natural causes over which we have no control

The second source is the contribution due greenhouse gases emitted as a result of human activity.

There is substantial disagreement with respect to how much Global Warming is caused by human activity and how much is caused by natural sources.

2007-06-13 15:09:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Maybe. But the right is now speaking up, so it's a wash.

"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives Tuesday to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"

"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."

James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.

“With overwhelming scientific evidence that global warming is adversely impacting the health of our planet, the time has come for the Congress to take action.”

Senator Olympia Snowe, Republican, Maine

"The overwhelming majority of atmospheric scientists around the world and our own National Academy of Sciences are in essential agreement on the facts of global warming and the significant contribution of human activity to that trend."

Russell E. Train, Republican, former environmental official under Presidents Nixon and Ford

"I agree with you (Gore) that the debate over climate change is over."

Rep. Dennis Hastert, Republican, Illinois

"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."

Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart

"Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."

Senator John McCain, Republican, Arizona

"I'm trying to learn [about greenhouse gases and global warming]. The more I learn, the bigger believer I become."

Senator Lindsay Graham, Republican, South Carolina

“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."

Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont

2007-06-14 00:08:21 · answer #2 · answered by Bob 7 · 2 1

Tue Jun 12, 6:24 PM ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards on Tuesday said the United States should join the Group of Eight in a call to cut global warming gas emissions in half by 2050.

Edwards, speaking in the Texas state capital of Austin, said U.S. climate-changing greenhouse gas emissions should be cut by 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050, according to a statement released by his campaign.

"Global warming is an emergency that requires immediate action from the world community," Edwards said. "Before the United States can rally the world to take action, we need to show leadership here at home. We should be leading the charge in this area, not turning our back on the world."

The former North Carolina senator and 2004 vice presidential nominee said he favors a cap-and-trade system of emissions credits and requiring developing nations to also aggressively cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Edwards has said previously he wants U.S. automakers to produce vehicles that average 40 miles per gallon by 2016.

2007-06-14 00:13:26 · answer #3 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 1

To help you understand the reality of things, here are some websites to check out.

www.fightglobalwarming.com

www.WillYouJoinUs.com

www.worldwildlife.org/climate

http://www.well.com/user/davidu/extincti...

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/internati...

http://www.climatehotmap.org/

http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/...

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/glob...

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/scien...

http://www.sierraclub.org/foundation/red...

http://www.environmentaldefense.org/page...

http://capcarbonpollution.org/

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/e...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15828892/...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...

http://www.awionline.org/pubs/quarterly/...

http://www.grinningplanet.com/2004/07-13...

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/glo...

2007-06-14 06:40:34 · answer #4 · answered by ren 2 · 2 0

What sudden silence?!? Get a clue...

...and pass a science class.

2007-06-13 22:40:52 · answer #5 · answered by Mentok! 7 · 5 2

No, they just aren't wasting their time on uneducated, ill informed cynics like you any more.

2007-06-14 03:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Your a complete idiot!!Did you go to Pat Robertson University?Or maybe your a Bush backer and think denial and stupidity are a way of life.

2007-06-13 22:01:33 · answer #7 · answered by Professor Riddle 5 · 5 4

very good -- humm -- ask the left about the ICE AGE IS COMING of the 60's/70's

Weather is definitely a good potato for politicians

2007-06-13 23:54:44 · answer #8 · answered by Kris 3 · 1 4

What kind of drugs are you on?

2007-06-13 21:54:03 · answer #9 · answered by clarity 7 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers