no. agnosticism is for people who sit on the fence. I ain't no fence sitter. no god in sight means there is no god.
2007-06-13 14:34:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by lou_lou 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
Religions contradict each other. More hatred and death (see Iraq) have resulted from religious belief than anything else. There is ample evidence that we have created god, rather than god creating us -- the contraditions between religions, along with their commonalities strongly suggest it.
Remember, Atheism is a "belief that there is no God". I'm an athiest because I believe there is no God. That doesn't mean I know it to all certainty, but I do believe I've examined what I know of the world and find the natural cause explanation for it far more likely than a supernatural one. Frankly, I think people who believe in god do so because they need to, or have been conditioned to. Agnosticism is the lazy choice of someone who doesn't hold an opinion.
2007-06-13 14:39:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thomas C 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
good judgment? If something is created, good judgment says there's a author. The regulation of Causalities says that each and each consequence has a reason. that's the inspiration of technological know-how. and it extremely is Logical. the great Bang has virtually all of us with a Logical innovations on board. That stated in case you pass each and all the till now to the 2nd earlier the great bang. the final reason for each thing that follows is Logically, What? I logicaly end that "something that could exist outdoors of Time" brought about it. What "that" is desires greater logical debate than we've area for. You seem into it and choose. even regardless of the undeniable fact that, Atheism is a call that takes "faith" no longer good judgment. You desire that there is not any God. a minimum of no longer a Christian God. because of fact IF there is. And IF we've a soul. Then we've a consequence. a minimum of that's what good judgment tells me.
2016-10-09 04:03:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by unrau 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agreed with you up to
"...isn't this prove of the existance of some short of a higher spirit?"
No, it isn't. It can't even be consider evidence for the possibility of god.
90+% of the world at one time believed the earth was flat and in the center of the universe.
Belief without evidence is not logical, and can never be a substitute for physical evidence, EVER.
What you ahve posted is a logical FALLACY called Argument from Popularity.
2007-06-13 14:43:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dark-River 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, evidence proves an idea, not people. Emotions are anecdotal and religious experiences vary per person, religion, culture, and social/demographic status.
More people in the world believe in Islam and polytheistic religions than in the Bible. Does that mean they are more correct than your religion?
Back to the drawing board.
The guy might have the subjective appearance of blue or gray eyes depending on the viewer, but you can still study the wavelengths produced by light on his eyes, so no problem. But can you do the same for god? How would you verify that one exists? Know of an experiment?
2007-06-13 14:37:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dalarus 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
1) Atheism does NOT try to disprove gods. It simply does not acknowledge the existence of such entities.
2) Majority means NOTHING.
You actually believe a majority opinion means PROOF? Did you ever take a science course? 500 years ago, 90% of the people thought the earth was flat, and at the center of this universe. My gosh you are a simple little thing, aren't you?
2007-06-13 14:41:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
"the 90% of the world says that they feel the present of a God or Gods or Godesses or another dimension or something like that.
so, isn't this prove of the existance of some short of a higher spirit? "
No. It just proves that a lot of people are deluded. You could probably persuade a good chunk of people that the sky is green, if you tried hard enough, but that wouldn't make it logical or true.
2007-06-13 14:36:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by BlueAngelGal 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
There is no writer without writing and anyone who says there is, is not complying with the sound intellect. Also, the presence of a building is evidence of the existence of a builder.
Using the same idea: the existence of this world is an evidence for the Existence of the Creator of it. The One Attributed with Will, Power, Knowledge and Wisdom.
2007-06-13 14:44:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by rose_ovda_night 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
There was a time when most humans thought the earth was flat. Exactly when did it become a sphere? Which came first, humans knowing it wasn't flat, or the shape-shift?
Oh, and our sun. Humans used to believe it rotated around the Earth, and that the Earth was the center of the universe. Did that make it so?
Reality isn't subject to vote.
2007-06-13 14:38:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by YY4Me 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
If 90% of the world thought it was a great idea to jump off a bridge would it be a great idea?
If 90% of the world thought it was a great idea to play in traffic would it be a great idea?
Because 90% of the world sees a hippo when they look at a cloud does that mean I am wrong because I don't see the hippo?
Your logic is flawed...
Please troll again....
2007-06-13 14:37:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Diane (PFLAG) 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
If 90% of your friends jumped off a bridge...
2007-06-13 14:45:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋