so for freedom of speech sake, it would be acceptable if i opened a museum and said that it is healthy to eat.

Question

glass and nails if that is what i believe??
You may speak of danger to health but what about danger to education and culture??? Of course i talk about the museum for crazy people where Lassy T-Rex plays peacefully with a bunch of happy children all together under the eyes of almighty god.

Answer 1

I think it would be more fun to just open nine other "Creation Museums" on the same street as the existing one, each highlighting a different creation story from other cultures. (Then loudly claim that everything in them is absolute fact.) It would do the best job of highlighting what a farce the "Creation Museum" is.

Answer 2

rofl. I think religions get special preferance here.
Start a religion where the unpure must purify themselves by eating glass and nails...make sure to change the definition of pure...
then make the museum, good to go.
But no seriously, as long it's not physical health, and there is still doubt as to the health impact, it's legal.
Yeah, creationist museum cannot be good, but some ppl think it is and the law, if not us, has to respect that opinion.

Plus those ppl are doomed to ignorance anyway.

Answer 3

I do see your point. However, it's pretty easy to define a health hazard to the satisfaction of most. Less so to define a danger to culture and education.
But personally, I'd be fully in favor of the Creation Museum serving glass and nails in their snack bar...

Answer 4

So you say teaching an alternative theory is unhealthy?
Isn't teaching an unproven theory even MORE dangerous?

I just find it interesting that evolutionary scientists have been collecting a huge mountain of evidence in support of the theory, yet in all the years of collecting, NO ONE has found definitive proof that the theory is in fact a fact.

Many respected scientists are actually weary of Darwin's Theory, calling it detrimental to good scientific research.
I'm not asking you to accept Creationism, but asking why you accept an unproven theory?

Answer 5

I agree that it is absurd to allow falsification of reality to be classed as a `museum`. However, when you cater for the gullible it`s so easy to lie.

Answer 6

Shhhhhh! Dont tell someone its good to eat glass, the goverment will start looking into it and spend our tax dollars on it

Answer 7

I t would be legal. Stupid but legal.

Is Barney in the creation museum ?

Answer 8

R U 4 real?

Answer 9

So long as it is privately funded you can do what you like, ain't private enterprise great.

Answer 10

What?