English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-13 13:01:19 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I should have added "and why?"

2007-06-13 13:06:59 · update #1

17 answers

I do...

because it covers any religious belief... rather than listing them all and trying not to offend... it's an "inclusive" term...

2007-06-13 13:02:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No because not all people who believe in religion are religious zealots.

re·li·gion·ism (r-lj-nzm)
n.
Excessive or affected religious zeal.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/religionists
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/religionists

Everyone's beliefs differ. Read more about atheism on wikipedia.

"Atheism, as a philosophical view, is the position that either affirms the nonexistence of gods[1] or rejects theism.[2] When defined more broadly, atheism is the absence of belief in deities, sometimes called nontheism.[3] Although atheists are commonly assumed to be irreligious, some religions, such as Buddhism, have been characterized as atheistic.[4][5]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism

There are also people who consider themselves to be Agnostic.

Agnosticism (from the Greek "a," meaning "without," and Gnosticism or "gnosis," meaning knowledge) means "unknowable," and is the philosophical view that the truth value of certain claims—particularly theological claims regarding metaphysics, afterlife or the existence of God, god(s), deities, or even ultimate reality—is unknown or, depending on the form of agnosticism, inherently unknowable due to the nature of subjective experience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic

Also recommended reading about Unitarians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarian

2007-06-13 20:15:06 · answer #2 · answered by llbbl 2 · 0 0

Never heard it used, ever. Until now. Can't say I am planning on adding it to my vocabulary.

2007-06-13 20:28:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dont know if they LOVE to but sometimes you hear it. Makes
people involved in organized religion sound extreme like communists or fascists.

2007-06-13 20:06:22 · answer #4 · answered by DoctorSchultz 3 · 1 0

I've never used that term nor have any intentions in using it any time soon and I'm atheist.

So much for a generilization.

2007-06-13 20:04:45 · answer #5 · answered by Layla 2 · 0 1

Atheists could be called unconverted Christians.

2007-06-13 20:18:46 · answer #6 · answered by WillRogerswannabe 7 · 0 1

I prefer "theist" because it rolls off the tongue better and gets my point across better by showing that they are the exact opposite of me.

2007-06-13 20:10:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don´t think so, bcuz it´s too formal, too long and alittle strange to use in a conversation.

2007-06-13 20:04:26 · answer #8 · answered by bAbY_Gurl26^ 3 · 0 0

Not sure but I might have gotten screwed either way

2007-06-13 20:06:14 · answer #9 · answered by Big B 2 · 0 0

Never heard of it till now.

2007-06-13 20:04:11 · answer #10 · answered by Haywood Jablomee 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers