English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I want to take up a martial art and I was just wondering what's the most practical for a 14 year old with a normal build? Also I want to know which is the most effective for protecting yourself in a fight?

2007-06-13 12:36:07 · 8 answers · asked by Ryan S 2 in Sports Martial Arts

8 answers

There is no "best" art. There are many good Martial Arts. The difference is more in the person doing the art than in the art itself. Here is a brief survey of styles:

Striking: Tae Kwon Do. Karate, Shaolin boxing
Good: Can handle multiple attackers, can engage at long range, enables you to be pro active when necessary.
Not so good: Ground, hard to control an attacker without inflicting serious injury.

Grappling: Hapkido, Judo, etc.
Good: effective in close, good on the ground, can control an attacker without inflicting serious injury.
Not so Good: Not good at long range, you must wait for the attacker to make the 1st move. Not effective against multiple attackers.

Find a good school in your area & don't worry about the name of the style.

2007-06-13 13:22:16 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 0

Martial arts ans game are two thoroughly distinct proposal. They in no way are identical. The two seem distinct and are practiced distinct. Unfortunately many in these days have no idea the change. Many are being taught a game and not ever gain knowledge of the artwork. Therefore men and women with out a expertise of the humanities see a vulnerable variation of a real artwork and gauge every person in keeping with their expertise of martial arts and so they don' have any expertise. I love how pugspaw, sensei scandal, stillcrazy positioned it. I don't have anything in opposition to those who play video games. That is fine for them. However, I am eager about having the expertise and capacity of self security. I'm eager about budo. I don't even desire to make use of the time period martial with game. The two does now not pass in combination. One is a sport. The different is conflict. There is not anything greater than whilst attacked realizing tips on how to role your self in a process that the attacker are not able to do whatever, however is uncovered to the whole thing as a way to quit the danger instantly. When I was once a little one I performed tag. I do not play that infantile sport anymore. We used to alternate punches in grade tuition. I do not alternate punches anymore. If I hit you I imply to quit you. I don't seem for a referee to mention you tapped out. I'll recognise you're out whilst the lighting pass out and also you pass limp. I'll recognise that you just give up whilst I pay attention or believe the joint snap. I'll recognise you are not able to use that limb proper now to try to damage me or my loved ones.

2016-09-05 15:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by devalcourt 4 · 0 0

If you ask anyone they'll suggest what they have done themselves.
Basically you cannot say which martial art is the best.
You better say what you want it for?
If you want it for self defence then the answer is easy.
I also was in the same situation and in younger times,I was looking to pick up a martial art.
Here is what I did:
Just look at competitions in the world that look more like a streetfight.
They are K1, UFC and Standard Boxing.
Tae Kwan Do is just good in the gym.
It does'n mean someone who is very good in TKD cannot defend himself.But for that you need to be among the best.
Basically any martial art master,(master means who has dedicated his life to that art),can successfully defend himself in a street fight.
But Karate and TKD are more into sporty values though the TKD Kicking style is the best among eastern martial arts(i.e. Karate and Kung Fu)
But in TKD they ignore using hands and it's practically ignoring half of your capacity.So TKD is good but not complete.
And a kick consumes 10 times more energy than a punch and damages the opponent by only 5 times more than a punch.
so you bet may want to be able to be good with punching skills and kicking skills reserved for occasions.

Looking at UFC , statistically most of them are from Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu(known as BJJ) and Mixed Martial Art(known as MMA) in UFC. And K1 champions have Kick Boxing, Muay Thai,Kyokushin Karate, Seidokan Karate and even Boxing back grounds.
Nowadays Sumo wrestlers also participare in K1 superheavyweights and they are quite good cause no punch or kick can hurt them cause they are so fat.
So if you want a martial art to help you get huge muscles and perfect for street fights, pick up one of these ones in UFC and K1.

Cause the rest of the martial arts are better for the competitions with their own rules.
If they were good for free style fighting, you'd see champions of free style with Tai Chi Chuan back ground and so.
So don't waste your time with them

Warning, the martial arts that I listed under UFC and K1 are absolutely difficult and physically extremely punishing, So you should be aware of what you are picking up.

2007-06-13 16:11:40 · answer #3 · answered by The One 4 · 0 0

So much really depends on the instructors in the schools.

Set up some time during classes that will have your ages in them & go and watch 3 or 4 studios for their whole hour class - you should feel a definate connection with at least one of them; and that is the one in which you will feel the most comfortable & that will allow you to learn more and learn faster - therefore allowing you the most protection in a fight - but all fights can be dangerous - so they are things to avoid if you can.

Good luck. My personal favorite style is Tang Soo Do; they are harder to find, but if one is near you - you should check it out.

2007-06-13 12:51:47 · answer #4 · answered by Metella 3 · 0 0

Any would be good. The practitioners of any style will tell you their's is best for self defense. Find out what is available in your area and find out what you can about the reputation of the Dojo before starting. I liked Jiu-Jitsu but it is not for everyone. It translates as " The gentle way " but it is just as much fun as the others and is a defensive style.
I have freinds into Tae Kwon Do and Aikido, more aggresive styles especially Aikido.

2007-06-13 12:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by Charles C 7 · 0 0

14. I'd try Shotokan, Shorinryu or a similar "Shuri" based Karate. Make sure though it's a good school, there are many bad sensei out there. (make sure they do kata, sparring, know history, etc... don't accept mediocre, you're going to dedicate years to training under a sensei) Often colleges have a Shotokan club that's quite good, if you can train with them at 14. (The one nearby here let's people of all ages, and not at the college train with them)

2007-06-13 15:21:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Taekwondo will help you in defensive tatics almost immediately. The instructors in the Dojans will strive to make you use your defensive skills as much as your offensive ones.

If an opponent has a tough time getting through your defense, he'll think twice before continuing his battle.

2007-06-13 12:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by Dan T 1 · 0 2

i think taekwondo is best because my bro is a black belt and it has really helped him. hes a normal size and is really good at protecting himself in fights i know that bc once we fought and he used his taekwondo on me lol.

2007-06-13 12:44:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers