I have noticed that some of the believers of several religions (not just Christianity, but others as well) state that their religions aren't like all the others, because they are not really religions, but "ways of life" and so on. However, is it not the case that - whether you agree with or believe in a certain religion or not - every religion can qualify as a way of life? If a person truly follows the tenants of their religion, then that implies that the way they live their life will change based on the beliefs they have adopted.
I think that for a religion to be a "way of life" is more dependent on whether or not a person is simply paying lip service to a religion, or is actually trying to follow it. What do you all say?
2007-06-13
10:49:06
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Shadowcat - My question was not whether or not some religions are different from each other. Of course they are different. However, whether or not a religion is a way of life is not the difference in my opinion. By the definition you have given, your point is still not proven. The definition you give begins with "the service or worship of God or the supernatural," then you go on to say that some have no god or many gods. Many gods still counts as "supernatural." Those without gods - such as Buddhism - still have a belief in the supernatural, which is what makes them different from the true atheist.
In any case, you have not answered the question, because worship of creation or even the self (if actually done, not simply stated) changes one's way of life. I know - I'm a Satanist, I worship myself. It changes the way I live my life versus the way I would live it if I were not a Satanist, thus it is a "way of life."
2007-06-13
11:18:25 ·
update #1
Apparently Shadowcat added more to his answer since I added details. Apologies, although I still did not intend to imply that all religions are the same.
2007-06-13
11:19:46 ·
update #2