Jesus even put nipples on my male puppy! How thoughtful is THAT?!
2007-06-13 09:22:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 3.9 7
·
8⤊
0⤋
And we also have DNA that is not represented in any other mammal, but, rather, corresponds within 5% of various Viral DNA strands...wait, isn't that how scientists do Gene therapy to cure conditions now? Whoops. So, unless we have a propensity for absorbing and duplicating viral DNA (we don't), there is probably some other reason for this "coincidence". I wonder what that could be?
Hey! I see you typing over there, Fundy! The answer isn't God. God wouldn't need to meddle with DNA, now would he/she/it? No. If God could create rocks and water without giving it DNA, why on earth would God need to give humans DNA, THEN slip in some virus DNA when we weren't looking? Seriously. That's like going anal and saying "Oops".
2007-06-13 16:33:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by necroth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The "junk DNA" argument is nothing more than the "vestigial organ" argument writ small. Just because scientists haven't yet found the function for a "pseudogene" or "vestigial" organ doesn't mean it doesn't have one. On the contrary, science is now finding many of what was once thought to be useless actually is useful.
2007-06-13 17:06:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Deof Movestofca 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not just that, but he decided to duplicate the exact same stretches of junk DNA in apes.
2007-06-13 16:26:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dark-River 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
And I get to share most of it with my cat!
2007-06-13 16:23:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Thanks a lot for my appendix! ! !
2007-06-13 16:25:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thanks, God!
2007-06-13 16:28:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋