http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/china_dinosaurs_dc
2007-06-13 09:01:29 · 26 answers · asked by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Tzadiq:
"they believe it had feathers, they have no proof" When a scientist says "believe", it doesn't mean "assume without reason or evidence". It's not the same as religious belief.
"note its head is a model not an actual fossil. They constructed this according to the article with two fossils" No.... according to the article, they found an entire skeleton. They only "SHOWED OFF" two of the bones.
""Of course, there's no way of knowing for sure," he added." (What can I say this sums up why its not new proof of evolution)
And there's no way of knowing for sure if Jesus was a messiah or if you exist at all. The only proofs exist in mathematics and everything else is measured by various degrees of certainty, so yeah, almost everything is "not completely for sure".
Oh, and your reading comprehension and total lack of understanding are the REAL crack ups here, kiddo.
2007-06-13 09:57:02 · update #1
Yes, it has.
From now on, I accept that evolution happened. Because Satan made it happen in a parallel universe then transported the fossils over here.
2007-06-13 09:05:56 · answer #1 · answered by The Church Lady 3 · 7⤊ 2⤋
No, but a new discovery is always welcome.
Some people don't understand just how fragile those old bones and fossils are, do they? *sigh*
2007-06-13 19:18:07 · answer #2 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eleventy read my mind with his Dawkins quote. Perfect. Will the Creationists ever figure out that EVERY new fossil species is a transitional fossil? Probably not.....
2007-06-13 16:12:55 · answer #3 · answered by Diogenes 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The only surprising thing about this "bird-like" dinosaurs is the size, not the first bird like dinosaurs found...
2007-06-13 16:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by chersa 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well the Creation Museum is trying to make room for it on their Ark exhibit now. 1.5 tons X 2. They need a lot more room.
2007-06-13 16:10:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I believed in evolution before. Now I believe it more. Be prepared for people to say the bones are 6000 years old and came from Noah's Ark.
2007-06-13 16:10:07 · answer #6 · answered by Graciela, RIRS 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Nope.
" Its forelimbs were very long and we BELIEVE it had feathers" (they believe it had feathers, they have no proof)
"The scientists showed off TWO huge fossilized BONES from the animal, and a model of its beaked head." (note its head is a model not an actual fossil. They constructed this according to the article with two fossils)
""Of course, there's no way of knowing for sure," he added." (What can I say this sums up why its not new proof of evolution)
Evolution is a faith based religion where two bones makes a new species that they BELIEVE may have had feathers.
You guys are a crack up.
2007-06-13 16:15:26 · answer #7 · answered by Tzadiq 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Now...there ya go... the missing dinosaurs from the ark simply flew away...it just all makes sense now.
2007-06-13 16:09:22 · answer #8 · answered by Ivyvine 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Honestly...we already knew about dinosaurs that had feathers, what's the big deal?
2007-06-13 16:08:24 · answer #9 · answered by 006 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Genesis 1:21
So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves, with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
Note the wording in Genesis 1:21 says every winged bird but makes no mention of flying, flight, sky, air,...
Genesis 1:22,23
And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth." 23So the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
Again note the wording of Genesis 1:22 that the "birds multiply on earth", it does not say "in the sky", nor does it mention "flight" of the birds yet since they were created in Genesis 1:21
2007-06-13 16:11:27 · answer #10 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋