English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Good question! Creationists have an inner self-justification and ability to ignore reality...could be useful. On the other hand, an evolutionist could be excited about the culling of those who don't know better than to smoke, thus improving the human race. There should be a reality show about this one. Include a Hindu too.

2007-06-13 07:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What is wrong with tobacco executives? They provide a legal product that people want at reasonable prices. What's wrong with that?

Too much tobacco use can kill you. I get it. I am not a smoker but some people are. That is their business. If you choose to smoke or chew or whatever one does with a legal product that is of no concern to me.

.

2007-06-13 14:36:30 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0 0

I guess it would require someone who is good at denying evidence, and being able to state bold faced lies without flinching.

Hands down, a creationist.

2007-06-13 14:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by Dark-River 6 · 1 0

the one that is actually a science not a fairy tale

2007-06-13 14:33:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whichever is the more heartless.

2007-06-13 14:32:18 · answer #5 · answered by Julian 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers