http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb
2007-06-13 07:28:28 · 10 answers · asked by damo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Will it attach to the Bat Utility belt?
2007-06-13 07:49:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not - without a doubt, the bat bomb would have been comparably expensive to create even one bomb. The bat bomb was also very specialized, designed to take out specifically paper and wood houses predominant in the Orient with incendiary charges.
Today, we have comparatively powerful cluster bombs that don't rely on bats and are better able to be used against normal concrete buildings that are more common today.
And if you want to destroy a civilian area the way the bat bomb does, a nuke is really the best thing to do the job with.
2007-06-13 07:40:58 · answer #2 · answered by f38stingray 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Then you'll have animal rights activists trying you
claw your eyes out over the idea.
I heard of the bat bombs. A novel idea at the time
before some of us were born.
And no, I don't think the program will start up again.
The art of war has gone so high tech now.
2007-06-13 07:45:27 · answer #3 · answered by Franklin Stein 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hahahahah! Hopefully never again! I heard a few rumors while I was in the military that the bats got loose and burned a Air Force base to the ground!
2007-06-13 07:53:20 · answer #4 · answered by hyperlite_140 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will not happen. The bat bomb was developed for a particular use given the technology of the day. With the advent of GPS and laser guided smart bombs, the need to burn entire cities has been eliminated. Without a need for a bat bomb, there is no reason to develop it.
2007-06-13 07:37:16 · answer #5 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow
Never even heard of that up until now but that is actually a really good idea; for WWII anyway. We have bombs now, not the little **** we had back then, we have BOMBS now. If the US Miltiary wants to totally demolish a country, it wouldnt take very long. But these pussy Insurgent wars dont work like that.
2007-06-13 07:33:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm no longer a canines breeder, yet when I were to develop into one i might want to pass to a canines educate, detect a canines breeder from the breed i'm fascinated that seems o.k. universal, and workout recurring procuring a astounding ***** from him/her. i might want to objective to locate one it really is as on the brink of the breed accepted as conceivable and breed her to a stud that corrects her faults yet also has maximum of her reliable characteristics. i does no longer search for a champion sired/mothered *****, yet one which has reliable temperament, hips, and fairly astounding conformation. that's an outstanding question; I want I had extra adventure in the back of me to help me with my answer! I easily have truly no adventure with canines breeding in any respect. Makes me get excitement from each and every of the further the very incontrovertible truth that there are accountable breeders contained in the international.
2016-11-23 17:57:21 · answer #7 · answered by doucet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do think with the use of nanotechnology that we will see artificial insects in a military role.
2007-06-13 08:17:56 · answer #8 · answered by oldhippypaul 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would they even bother? its a 1940s idea, todays warfare is all about near pin-point accuracy and identifying your targets, you cant do that with flying-rodents.
As well as having the animal-rights looneys on your back.
2007-06-13 07:33:59 · answer #9 · answered by conranger1 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
lol.... Thats awesome...
2007-06-13 07:32:32 · answer #10 · answered by Dan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋