That is the most brilliant idea I have heard and it
should be implemented right now!!
2007-06-13 03:18:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
inspite of your - or any provider member's - thoughts are, in truly straightforward incontrovertible truth that the military is mission to civilian administration basically so as that they don't look attending to make those judgements. They implement the guidelines of the President and, using truth the military is in hardship-loose words the flexibility for attaining the purpose, they don't look attending to make certain what those aims are or how or maybe as they are going to be reached. Letting the military verify even as the mission is complete does no longer be an particularly reliable theory, besides. How might want to they arrive to a decision? Democratically? What in the journey that they could now no longer attain an settlement? What might want to they base their decision on? i do now no longer propose to insult any provider persons (relatives contributors and a form of of different close pals have served contained contained in the military, military, and nationwide preserve once you concentrate on that Vietnam) yet they have not were given get get admission to to to really professional information that would want to enable them to make what's fairly a lot a strategic and political decision. like it or now no longer, that's how that's. i do now no longer see how a prudent or imprudent decision with get excitement from to the protection rigidity has some thing to do with patriotism, inspite of the indisputable fact that.
2016-11-23 17:13:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What about evidence that shows most Gitmo prisoners are really just sheep herders and scared young men who had nothing to do with terrorist acts in any nation? Yet we are in their countries setting up long term military bases so that we can control their oil. The leaders in America right now are turning us into an imperialistic nation.
2007-06-13 03:28:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by anch49 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
If we do that, then we will be giving them what they want.. They want to die as "martyrs", or some crap like that... Unfortunately we are bound by the Geneva Convention to stoop to their level of cowardly practices...
If it were up to me, I would give each one of them an hours worth of oxygen in a tank, bury them head first into a deep pit of human s*** with their hand tied behind them, and make them think for that hour on how terrible dying upside down in a pit of crap would make them feel.... They definately wouldnt be martyrs like that, and im sure it would send a strong signal to all the other cowards that want to join the ranks of terrorist networks.
Take that you liberal pu**ies
2007-06-13 03:35:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well not all at once, but yes, shooting 10 or so for every dead American soldier, and smearing their bodies with pig's blood would help. And for every roadside bomb we get hit with--- BOOM, say goodbye to another mosque. But no, apparently our leaders don't have the guts to take these guys out.
2007-06-13 03:41:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by John L 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're no better than them if you want to do that, scumbag.
There is something called the "Geneva Convention", something an ignorant moron like you may have never heard of.
The US has signed it, and it says you're not allowed to do things such as that to either POWS or members of an organized resistance. That applies DIRECTLY to Al Queda.
Turn the other cheek, do not return evil with evil.
2007-06-13 04:53:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by CanadianFundamentalist 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
So then why not just shoot every criminal - or people even suspected of crimes - no, wait, why not people who even think about committing crimes.
To beat the criminals you must show them a higher level of criminality after all.
Or perhaps you should do things the right way, or else you're just a terrorist with a flag and a national anthem.
2007-06-13 03:14:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
nope that's what they want ,then they would call it Martyrdom like Saddam.Load up some Super soakers full of pig blood and spray them down tell them that hope their descent to alla
be slow and painful.
2007-06-13 03:49:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by overthere 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, sorry we can't do that. The libs would have screaming fits if we did. Good idea though. Do a little tit for tat and maybe the Islamofacists would get the message.
2007-06-13 03:16:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
no i think what your doin is just fine.draconian ,medievel,barbaric treatment of what? couple hundred 'terrorists' you cant even bring charges against.death on the battlefield is glorious to them.machavellian like torture is better,dont you think?
2007-06-13 03:58:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋