Depends, if you live in American where big business has paid large sums of money to keep the use of BGH (Bovine growth hormone) legal even though it's been shown to cause cancer, then there's a decent possibility. We're one of the only major countries left in the world that hasn't banned it.
2007-06-06 05:10:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Martyrtoprincipl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Smoking second hand milk is way worse than drinking smoke.
2007-06-06 05:07:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Salami and Orange Juice 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's the opposite.
Second hand smoke is bad.
Drinking milk is much better then second hand smoking.
2007-06-06 05:07:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by itonosato@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually if u drink 3 glasses of 2% reduced milk everyday, u lose weight, also its a good source of calcium. second hand smoke is worse than smoking cigarette urself.
2007-06-06 05:08:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by sparrow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure some smoking advocate will come up with a bunch of reasons to support a yes to your question.
The fact still remains that smoking is dangerous and deadly. Nothing that anyone ever says will change that.
2007-06-06 05:14:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rothwyn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what kind of a question is that? Milk is so good for you...I have never heard i compared (or contrasted for that matter) to second hand smoke.
2007-06-06 05:09:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by pink longhorn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
second hand smoke is worse than milk
2007-06-06 05:07:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Donnie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the beastie's milk you're drinking was a chainsmoker then it might be, but with the price of smokes going up, I think you're pretty safe.
2007-06-06 05:08:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Milk strengthens bones while second hand smoke exposes you to the risk of cancer.
2007-06-06 05:09:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Milk good - smoke bad
2007-06-06 05:08:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sarah 3
·
0⤊
0⤋