Why is it that when we abort a human fetus, it's murder, but when we abort a chicken fetus, it's an omelet??? Since when were humans more moral than chickens?
2007-06-05 15:32:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Killing a chicken is killing a chicken .but killing an innocent human AT ANY PHASE OF HIS/HER DEVELOPMENT is killing an innocent human. Abortion is just a nice way of saying human feticide.
2007-06-05 15:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by James O 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Chicken eggs that we eat are unfertilized eggs, so they would never be a baby chicken. It is like when women have thier period and lose an egg, which was not fertilized.
So go ahead and take my egg, but once it is fertilized and is a fetus, in my opinion it is a life.
2007-06-05 22:36:43 · answer #2 · answered by Beverly B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Animals are not moral or immoral. They have no moral capacity at all since they do not have a spiritual nature and are not created in God's image and likeness. You really have been watching too much Chicken Run.
2007-06-05 22:57:45 · answer #3 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
PLease tell me you are not comparing human life to that of a chicken. In the new testament we were allowed to eat any animal and not just a selected few things like before. Chickens fall inot the category of things we can eat. Humans do not fall into that category. Human life is precious. Chickens do not have souls.
2007-06-05 22:40:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
People are made in the image of God. Chickens are not.
The bible says life is in the blood. When a BABY is aborted, blood is shed - innocent blood. The baby did not choose to die and couldn't speak for itself. Shedding innocent blood curses the ground we live on - shame on this nation.
2007-06-05 22:53:06 · answer #5 · answered by Joy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The eggs we eat aren't fertilized. Human fetus's are.
2007-06-05 23:19:01 · answer #6 · answered by KJ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have often wondered how some people can argue that the morning after pill (taken up to 5 days after conception, before cells have specialized) is morally wrong yet hunting fully developed animals (with a heart and brain) is acceptable.
To each their own, I suppose.
2007-06-05 22:42:03 · answer #7 · answered by Ashley 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you really comparing humans to a chicken? When chickens invent, drive, contribute to society besides delicious dishes, etc, then they can stop being considered food.
2007-06-05 22:37:35 · answer #8 · answered by Flighty 1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cause you can't eat a human fetus...well technically you could, but it just wouldn't be right.
2007-06-05 22:38:36 · answer #9 · answered by ash_stevenson_06 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suppose because humans don't scramble up as well with cheese as pre-chicks do.
2007-06-05 22:36:03 · answer #10 · answered by silvercomet 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋